zlfan

Just tested C4K 24p, 60p, 4K 24p, 60p, FHD 60p, 120p, 200p. All in H265 10 bit HLG. The same landscape scene, focused at infinity at F8 using a manual focus lens. Viewing on a 27 inch 4k monitor at a viewing distance of 1 meter in full screen mode without any zooming in. C4k 24 p and 60 p look very close, 24p might be a tiny bit punchier. If don't pixel peeping, hardly any difference to my eyes. FHD 60p, 120p, 200p are noticeably less detailed and muddier. C4K 60p 10 bit HLG looks fine even to the latest standard. But none is as good as the 120p photo mode. I used art 1 filter, so the jpeg looks very colorful and punchy, but still has a good dr, much better than EM5 in art 1 mode, which has a very limited dr. The IQ of the 120p 20 mp raw plus jpg is just like, eh, the photo quality. LOL. Somehow the mf lens can not be stabilized by OM1, almost no stabilization at all to my eyes. Big bomber to me, as I bought this OM1 to stabilize my mf lenses.

mf lenses with 5d3 on stick still have rolling shutter. so go canon l lenses with optical is if rolling shutter is important. you will be amazed.

I found out that the major issue of the 5d3ml, the rolling shutter, is almost unnoticeable when using the 16-35 f4 is. the optical is is really good. very stable. and no rolling shutter.

the color gives me some true nostalgic feeling. very few cameras can bring this feelings to me. one of my best footages is from this rig. 5d3ml with 16-35 l f4 is cannot neither, although it is good for hand held. the former rig is for stick.

om-1 seems having much better dr than em-5. i remember that in art filter 1, em-5 has very narrow dr. om-1 in art filter 1 looks much better. just a quick observation. will test more.

is high tax on chinese high tech products good or bad? i think in the short term it is good, protecting local high-tech industries. in the long run, not sure about the benefits. maybe the states will come up with something totally new, revolutionize the society, thus lead the world in a clear-cut edge. maybe not.

totally true.

your neighborhood is nice. you must live a comfortable life too.

actually, modern trains are high tech instruments, no less than red cams. lol.

it is all about the union.

it is all the iphone's fault.

Actually this is the true reason for log or raw, not the dr thing.

some in camera picture profiles are actually mimicking famous film stocks. just we power users typically skip these in stock styles.

i also found that log plus some in camera painting is much better than log then post lut for 8 bit even 10 bit cameras.

i bought my om-1 brand new at $1099 at om store on bf.

true.

5d3 has no mojo except its ml raw for video and time lapse.

for stills, ccd cameras rule.

you kept s1h and sold s5 2x?

every time when i grade 14 bit true lossless ml raw, i am so happy.

just did some shots on a local busy street. the 120p photo mode is nice, people mostly ignored me. some although noticed me, but 75 frames were blasted in less than 1 second, just like taking one picture, very quick. the buffer clearance time was not bothering most of the time, because i spent time looking for the next good frame. v90 cards may cut the time in half. but i am really ok with it, at least for now. it reminds me of the nikon 1 v1, v1 can only do 60p 30 frames. in conclusion, it is a turbo gopro.

then i probably will use c4k 24/30p for long shots. i found out that c4k 10 bit h265 has only two picture styles, om400 log, hlg. kind of limiting. in photo m mode, sh1 silent fast electronic 120p, or sh2 50p or sh 20p, all of the art filters can be used, buffer is 75 if recording raw plus superfine jpeg. the refresh time is about half a minute. i like this mode very much.

for new cameras, i care very much about the ibis. i have a gopro12, good is, now om-1, good ibis. in the future, maybe s5 3 x, something like that, good ibis on ff so good low light.

s1h is ff, not doubt it is better in some major aspects.

the reason why i am interested in c4k is because i read from several sources that c4k 24p is more detailed than uhd 4k on em1 mk iii em1x etc. if om-1 c4k 60p is as detailed as c4k 24p, it is probably oversampled 4k from the 6k sensor. plus, using 60p to negate the low bit rate codec, finally, this mode can stand up against other big name cameras. if this works in real world shooting, om-1 is a sleeper, actually. certainly it is not good for low light, the sensor size is m43/43.