thephoenix

? i don't have that red button ?

i thought the recording time limit was old story.

4 hours ago, Attila Bakos said:

FYI:

 

oups. makes more sense then

hi

also interrested in getting into anamorphic someday with my xt3.

any news about your setup ? any tests already ?

not that bad.

too bad it won't work with my xt3

40mm is like 80 on 35mm ?

i don't really understand why this app is for android systems as most of editors works on computers when it comes to video.

i don't use my phone to grade.

or maybe this is aiming the instagram / social networks community ?

3 hours ago, Attila Bakos said:

If they fixed it then that's the best solution FYI hlg was also interpreted incorrectly, I had to create a different matrix correction for that issue. I hope they fixed it as well.
I don't have the beta installed but it would be interesting to see if they only fixed this for Fujifilm files (as the changelog dictates), or in general. The issue is not specifically about Fujifilm files, but I guess Fuji people were the only one complaining.

didn't know there was the same issue with hlg.

well i use the ninja with the xt3 so internal files are only here as backup files.

so to fix my issue i have 2 options, 1 is convert all my files 2 buy your lut package

On 5/23/2019 at 7:23 PM, Attila Bakos said:

Unfortunately I don't have time to go into the details right now, but I recommend you watch the video in the thread I linked earlier (previous page), it has the answers to most of your questions.

well i re watched the video and ok it is clear when you apply the lut, but my concern is that you don't use rcm. it's funny how few people use rcm when you know how powerfull and usefull it is.

i think i understood anyway why my test still had the color issue. i didn't checked the conversion to 709 in shutter encoder.

i could use ffmpeg yes but

1 i have over 100 files to convert so i don't have 2 days to spare to conversion

2 shutter encoder does use ffmpeg

good news is now problem is fixed in 16b3 and i shoot hlg so no issue with it

https://www.newsshooter.com/2019/06/02/vazen-1-8x-anamorphic-for-m43-cameras/

not cheap but not that expensive either

https://www.newsshooter.com/2019/06/02/vazen-1-8x-anamorphic-for-m43-cameras/

7 hours ago, currensheldon said:

I have a feeling this thing has some more goodies up its sleeve that Panasonic hasn't told us about yet. Let everyone talk about 6K and 10-bit for a couple of months and then drop a few more big things - still holding out hope for internal ND... 

well in that case then they have the worst marketing team ever.

when you release a product you wannna sell as much as possible right from the start and not "wait" for the competitors to launch a new product before selling your product

i just don't get why so many are excited about flippy screen.

we're gonna have 6k vloging, wowwww, now i am excited

https://www.atomos.com/neon

at least seems like there is much more room for mistakes ?

that is the moment you find all these little things like labels, naming, metadata (and you name it) are getting so usefull i guess.

never did long project but always been curious how they do it.

sure it's hours if not days of organizing things right.

i am sure you have good tutorials on youtube

7 minutes ago, Anaconda_ said:

My understanding is, you don't need to be with this. Plug everything in, press record and then get your levels right in post. (obviously not good working practice - at least try and get them right in the box)

sounds a bit simple but it looks like it. if it works that well the uses are endless ? for a reasonable price i find.

looks like perfect for itw as it is tiny. don't know if it can be put under a camera cage. but sure accessories will come soon

4 minutes ago, Anaconda_ said:

The test sample here is pretty amazing, and the explanation of how it works is also very interesting. I also like how it runs on NPF batteries as well as AA. Not sure on the menus though.

yep. i am nt a sound person but it sounds quite amazing. and it's tiny

10 hours ago, ade towell said:

Yes I've had enough of Canon and their shitty ways, am in the midst of selling all my Canon gear and have just got a Fuji XT3 - amazing camera for the price and looking forward to investing in a company who actually seem interested in giving people what they want. 

It feels great being free of all the frustrations being tied into the Canon system gives you. 

did that. xt3 is such a great camera, and for very resonable price.

maybe you want to keep some canon lenses that are pretty good in general. but fuji lenses are great too, just canon lenses have adaptaters to all brands so if you change in the future you can keep canon lenses when it might be difficult to keep the fuji

38 minutes ago, androidlad said:

More datarate per group of frame to minimise F-log blocking/banding.

and why not hlg you seemmed to be prefering it to flog by far

4 hours ago, thebrothersthre3 said:

The EOS R and Nikon Z were just the start.

or the end.

R is really bad for it"s price and Z is gonna cost a ton to nikon for recall.

the others brands won't wait for them.

and if canon keep it's policy of "you're gonna pay the high price for something that could be good but sorry we couldn't give you that because the  other camera that is even more expensive does it" they are going straight into the wall

the camera is for pro market so the mount is not really an issue.

it's like saying in the old days the pentax 6x7 will never sell because of it's specific mount. same for most mf.

he probably said in an episode that ff is the way to go and M43 is dead, that is why the bmcc4k isn't selling ?

these guys just don't know what to do and say to get an audience and a new youtube episode

anyway, some brands don't share the same opinion https://www.fujirumors.com/alpa-announces-a-new-range-of-products-for-fujifilm-gfx-100/

26 minutes ago, KnightsFan said:

I've never used mocha before. I have a feeling that the Resolve feature will be most useful for tiny objects in the far background that aren't super noticeable anyway, because so far I'm not getting anything really good out of it.

Think It is machine learning based so will improve in time

7 minutes ago, KnightsFan said:

Has anyone else tried out the new object removal tool? I'm experimenting with it today and it's really fun so far. The results aren't great yet, so I'm trying to learn what scenarios it works for and where it fails.

i wish but full version only and don't have the full. from what i've seen it seems easier to use than mocha which is kinda tricky for newbies like i am

4 minutes ago, andrew_dotdot said:

Yep. I'm all up to date on the fw, and all the lenses are on Fringer's supported list. So it was all a bit disappointing for me -- though I'd never used lenses with an adapter before. I didn't know what to expect, and I thought it was all part of the deal.

In similar conditions, those L lenses' AF is really reliable on a Canon body. They were super on the 70D, and still bringing home the bacon on the 5D3. ?

don't know the lenses you have but i know some canon lenses can have bad af.

sold my 50mm and 85mm both 1.2 because the af were such a pain.

got the 100mm 2.8 macro who's af is not that great too but at least it is really sharp and has is. Is is also why i bought the 85 1.4 but never used it yet ? will do some day but the crop factor with the fringer makes it too long for me i guess.  but i am sure its af is pretty good too as it is a really recent build lense.

Well i am more of a manual focus person when It comes to video. But when i tried my Tamron af with the fringer It was really good  to me. And It was prior to fw  3.0

The Tamron Is quite new. so is the af It uses. maybe that Is  the beginning of an answer. Make also sure your fringer fw is up to date     

Will test the 85mm 1.4 from canon too but will be in 2 weeks as I am on a trip at the moment.

Got a 5D

3 hours ago, Inazuma said:

Can someone tell me how good autofocus is in video with EF speed boosted lenses?

depends on lense af and motors. it is pretty good on my tamron 24-70 and my 28mm 2.8. i mean when i compare to the same lenses on a canon body.

i also have canon 85mm 1.4 but didn't tried it yet on the fuji

to me the problem is not the adapter but the lense's af itself.