Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Michi last won the day on July 23

Michi had the most liked content!

About Michi

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. πŸ˜‚ This post was a genuinely funny read. Adequate tone for the decision made by Canon (if it really gets confirmed in the next few days). Way more healthy to just laugh at this. And I say that as a Canon shooter who hoped to replace the M50 with one of these... Hope dies last, but it dies... πŸ˜‚
  2. Couldn't have said it better! 24p was in the 60D, 70D and 80D. Removing it now is just a silly and unnecessary move. While I also haven't shot in 24p for years lots of people do. And it would just be nice to have that option in this camera too.
  3. I had to laugh out loud reading this. But anyway, there's no reason to skip 24p in this camera when they had it in any other of their xxDs and even the M cameras. No argument. Licence fees? I don't buy that.
  4. I'd say it either means pixel binning or line skipping...
  5. Relax. Not saying 24p is for "film wannabes" only, that was somebody else. I just said that I never shoot 24p. But I have absolutely no problem with people shooting 24p. Edit: Ok, I get it now. My sarcasm-detector was off when I quoted ntblowz... Yet I still shoot all my stuff in 25p. Nothing wrong with that in Europe from my POV.
  6. While I never shoot 24p either – it's just silly if they're really leaving out 24p again. As if they'd want to give their critics a valuable argument by purpose. But there's still hope they just listed the highest fps in PAL and NTSC modes in the 90D video and 24p is in there nonetheless...
  7. I think you are way to critical, and I mean that in a good way. Watching without knowledge about what camera etc. was used for me was a good experience, kind of like looking mor freely at the videography... And yours looked nothing short of good to my eyes. So for me this competition was also a reminder that filming is a craft first. And that good craftsmen and -woman can work with every tool. πŸ‘
  8. Hey TrueIndigo Thanks for the explanation. I had no idea octagonal photosites even existed... I assume there are less issues with moire on that sensor, if any at all? Very cool!
  9. In all honesty: I would have paid off the winner of the competition the amount 60Ds go on Ebay right now rather than handing over mine if I lost. This is the first camera I bought with my own money so it has some emotional value for me and will remain on my shelf πŸ˜‰
  10. Congrats to @PannySVHS and @Framed_By_Dan and to all other participants as well! Some very exotic camera choices and lenses already revealed. Now I'm particularly curious to see what camera @TrueIndigo has used. I liked the colours of that one the most. And of course which lens created that unusual bokeh in the contribution of @Wronzoff. My choice was very boring and unspectacular, as I used what I already owned: Canon 60D and 60mm Macro with some cheap 0.9 ND (EOS standard colour profile without any grading).
  11. You can export up to UHD in the free version of resolve. 4K DCI and above only in the studio-version. Not sure about any other limitations.
  12. The self-hosted Video looks better in Safari than anything I have seen on Vimeo and YouTube so far – good job Mr. Reid! But in Chrome the Thumbnail remains visible after pressing play while sound is playing fine (iMac 5K, 2017). Is that only happening on my Computer? And yes – great IQ on the S1! Impressive
  13. Good old 4:3. The colors look quite good for me. Did you need to import from tape to edit this? If this camera really is native 4:3, I bet you had to pay quite a lot to own one back then. Good job Edit: since there seems to be only an auto-mode to shoot video, I assume this could just as well be shot with one of the better video capable DSLRs in the early days of digital imaging.
  14. Very interesting, unusual Bokeh on this shot (for my eyes at least). I wonder what lens created that... Nice grading too!
  15. I absolutely agree with you. But I donβ€˜t think this contradicts what I said . My point is that putting better video specs into Cameras with stills oriented form and ergonomics will not compensate for the sales lost to smartphones. The cake got bigger, but the slice for MILCs and DSLRs is getting proportionally smaller. And from my POV it’s not because of technical reasons. Just like offering 96kHz 24bit WAVE support could not turn around the decline in sales of portable music players (not the best comparsion but you get my Point).
  • Create New...