Dunjoye

From what I have seen so far, there isn't anything significantly new in terms of motion cadence and Color science on the Gh5 that has the wow factor

The C-log would be a welcomed improvement to the 5d mark iv imo. But it's not a deal breaker No disrespect to these user made log profiles. They are great but they just don't have the same kick as the C-log. An improvement on the crop however would be a big bonus. I think the log would be more appreciateon on the 1dx mark ii . The 1dc with a dpaf improvement would be my deal choice, however I believe they are done with the camera.

Pixels isn't everything. If I was doing stills only, It wouldn't even be a deciding factor for me. plus I think the 1dc as a faster burst rate. The autofocus, Wifi monitoring is a big plus. Does anyone know if the 1dc outputs 1080 60fps via hdmi?

Thanks guys, Yeah, I have decided to settle for the the 1DC. I will probably do same as treb999 and upgrade to the 1DXii later down the line. Thanks Andrew. I have been following this forum for years but never posted. Some great reviews over the years.

I am probably the only person that welcomes this addition on the the Canon Eos range. Which leads me to the question. Which is better to go for for 4k video 1DC VS 5D MARK IV. Log is not a massive deal breaker for me but its a great addition. I do like the 1Dx mark ii Profile colors (out of my budget)which is identical to the 5DMK4 at 4k MJPEG. The 5DMK4 does shoot at 30fps 4K. Which one is better to go for? 5DMK4 ; £2700 1DC: £2500-3500 - depending on shutter count & condition Another question does the 1dc record 60fps 1080 out? Apologies if this topic has been done before.