Jump to content

The Chris

Members
  • Posts

    647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Chris

  1. I think Canon is done. They could produce a killer camera in this space, but choose not to. As a former Canon owner I would love to see them actually do something game changing. But I like many have come to realise Canon have rested on their laurels for too long. Innovation is something they have forgotten how to do... At least at this level of the market.

    ​Sony has 11% of the market and most of its imaging profits come from sensor production and the pro video division - not the E-mount. Canon is far from done. The A7rII filled the spec sheet, but at $3200 it isn't going to be a big seller. For landscape and 4k shooters its a nice option, but Sony's crappy flash system and small lens lineup compared to the big two isn't going to get a lot of people to dump Canon or Nikon anytime soon - especially since this sensor will find its way into the next D8xx and I'm guessing Nikon will roll out 4k with the new flagship. I've said all along, I bet the 5d4 will have 4k as well.

    Glad to see Sony finally putting all its best tech into one camera, but 4k and BSI means its twice the price of the A7II and NX1? And still no 14-bit raws? Only 5fps? Meh. Most FE lenses are grossly overpriced as well. $1600 for the 35/1.4 when my Nikon Sigma cost half that and is actually smaller? My D750 body weighs 5 ounces more than the A7II, the whole small/light argument for mirrorless is gone. Hopefully the next versions of the A7s and the lower MP A7 get all the new toys and don't cost over three grand.

  2. Had a simple adapter for non-G lenses that worked well: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003JFMRQS?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o06_s00

    Went with the expensive Novoflex for G lenses: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/687512-REG/Novoflex_NX_NIK_NX_NIK_Lens_Adapter.html

    But it looks like you have cheaper options through amazon. Just search "Nikon G to Samsung NX" and you will get a few results. 

    ​Does the Novoflex control the aperture in the lens or is it one of those with the aperture inside the adapter? Thanks in advance.

  3. ​It's definitely not more intuitive since Premiere (and FCPX) provide one integrated interface for media management, editing and rendering, whereas in Resolve these three functions are separated into three modules/screens that look and feel like independent programs. (Color Grading is the fourth module/tab, btw.) So you'll find yourself switching forth and back a lot. The advantage of this interface design is that Blackmagic can improve and extend the editing functionality without making the program convoluted.

    Whether or not Resolve is faster, depends on your hardware. Resolve has high hardware requirements, particularly for CPU, GPU and RAM while Premiere is a great performer even on low end and older machines. However, if you have a fast machine (for example, with a current-generation i7 CPU, current-generation Nvidia GTX card, 16-32 GB RAM and dedicated video hard drive), Resolve can perform much better than Premiere. Thanks to very advanced disk caching, you don't run into disk performance problems where you do with Premiere, and thanks to excellent GPU support, real-time playback even with complicated color grades is great, and rendering times are much shorter.

    At the moment, Resolve 11 can basically do  everything that Premiere and FCPX can do (manifest in the fact that it can import their projects via XML) except for a number of built-in effect filters. However, there are two limitations: (1) The editing tools are quite basic. You get pointer/drag-and-drop, blade, trim/slip but no ripple and roll edit tools. Keyboard shortcuts are very basic and limited, too, so currently I'm editing much faster with Premiere. (2) While Premiere imports almost any video and audio file, Resolve is limited to h264 + all common professional raw, intermediate and camera codecs (CinemaDNG, Red, ArriRaw, ProRes, Cineform, DnXHD/HR, XDCAM, XAVC etc.). It only imports audio files that have been conformed to 16bit/48 KHz wav. Audio editing, in Resolve 11, is quite rudimentary, too.

    You can indeed buy Neat Video as an OFX plugin and use it in Resolve. The only problem is that the OFX version costs twice as much as the Premiere version (around $350), and that applying Neat within a Resolve project will kill real-time performance (unless you manually deactivate the nodes where Neat has been applied).

     

    ​Great summary. It looks like R12 had expanded the NLE capabilities beyond 11. Looking forward to 12 being released.

  4. Cant wait for it to be released. Most of my editing is pretty basic, but I shoot with a number of different cameras and I've been using premiere for years. I'm still on CS5 because I shelled out for the full suite and then got burned with the 5.5 update a few month after FCPx came out. Outside of Lightroom, I'm not buying another Adobe product if I can avoid it. Resolve will serve as my NLE and grading app. Kudos to Blackmagic for making it more full featured.

  5. Thats not entirely true imo. ​You could go either way on this.

    In another year (2016) even submitting a project on 1080p HD, you may not get people to even want to view it. They may bypass it altogether (unless the film was recommended by someone they know and trust in the biz) 

    Also, once Blu Ray 4K hits - everyone and mean everyone will want to see all new films on their brand new badass 4K Blu Ray player.

    At that point, forget it.

    ​I don't see how that's even possible, the worlds largest digital distributors - Nexflix and iTunes - have almost no 4k content and 4k TV's are still a few years from being commonplace in the home. Its still a very small, niche market because there's virtually no readily available and cheap content. That $600 Samsung player with the preloaded BS isn't moving the needle, neither is a 4k version of that crappy Spiderman movie Sony is constantly pimping. There's no cheap 4k DVD content anywhere and its not likely to take hold anytime soon because the market is already completely saturated with DVD/Bluray and the next-gen stuff seems to be skipping physical media and moving to streaming. Japan, Korea, U.S., UK and others at the cutting edge of broadcasting are not even true 1080p yet. DVD sales have cratered thanks to VOD and digital sales. Phones and Tablets have taken a big chunk of the viewing pie, 4k is overkill on those devices as well.

    Large corporations are only interested in one thing - profit. If an overwhelming majority of your audience is living in a 1080p world - nobody is turning up their noses at content because its not 4k. I'm sure it can't hurt to have 4k, but in no way is anyone limited because its not. Next year isn't going to be any different than this year, a few 4k shows/movies on Nexflix and such, but little else. 

  6. If you read the whole presentation - not just the few slides SAR posted and his half-baked analysis - a lot of that is happening above the A7 in the pro broadcast realm, not on the consumer level.

  7. @The Chris:

    I could go to $1.000 if necessary, but if I could keep it lower, that would of course be nice. The Benro S8 is too big for my needs. Furthermore - according to my research - it needs more weight  than my gear will ever weigh to be correctly balanced. The same goes for the Manfrotto 504 HD, - too big. And for some reason I don't quite have confidence in the smaller 502.

    The S8 has 4 steps of counterbalance and a long plate to find your balance. I ordered one to test for my needs. The one downside of trying to go too small/light is the lack of decent counterbalance and nice, fluid damped movements. To go light you lose some of those features or they're less adjustable. The 502 has the tilt lock knob on the right side- which is un-intuitive compared to most fluid heads that put the lock on the left. It lacks the adjustments I want as well. I don't use my tripod enough to justify twice what the S8 costs - I just want carbon sticks, the ability to go low to the ground and a decent fluid head. My last setup weighed 12 pounds and had an annoying mid-spreader that I couldn't remove, this one is a couple less and no goofy spreader. Any lighter than about 10 pounds and you're usually talking flimsy sticks or small heads at this pricepoint. I wish there were more options in the sub $1000 range. Good luck with your serach.

  8. What's your budget?

    I've been looking at the Benro S8 for a decent lo-budget option since I don't use a tripod very often:

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1026242-REG/benro_c373fhs8_s8_video_tripod_kit.html

    There are a few good videos on Youtube, it looks like a good DSLR weight head - leveling ball, adjustable counterbalance/drag and with a set of CF sticks for $625. The AL version is cheaper, but I shoot in the sun a lot and AL sticks get really hot to the touch.

    Manfrotto has some nice performing heads like the 504 HD, but it doesn't look any better than the S8.

    Sachtler makes great heads, some of the best. I had the FSB-4 that accidentally got left behind at a shoot.

    No experience with Miller.

  9. I used this one in the past, I keep going back and forth with AS plates because I hate stacking a couple components that essentially do the same thing, just adds weight and more stuff to fiddle with.

    http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/Shop/Lever-Release-Clamps/B2-LR-II-Lever-release-clamp.html

    The lever QR works really well and doesn't have the issues some of the knob release models encounter when mounting on a video tripod - since some of the knobs extend below the bottom of the clamp. Don't know if there are any cheap knockoffs, RRS doesn't come cheap.

  10. APSC camera oustells FF because it is cheaper, and the mass sales come from standard people, not the passionates or the pros. 

    You guys are very funny. Say a system is not dead because it ranks good on Amazon. LOL . . . 
    Steve Jobs would be shocked in his tombstone. 

    When I say APSC is dead I am not talking about Amazon ranking, I am talking about THE DIRECTION photo and video is taking, and this direction is towards FF and not APSC which sets the death of APSC. 
    Of course it will sell on Amazon this year, the next year and year after. You are very funny ....

    ​Your lol-filled argument makes no sense whatsoever, APS-c sales completely trounce FF. And it isn't even close. APS-c isn't going anywhere, because its the dominant force in the market - plain and simple. Even Steve Jobs' corpse is smart enough to see that. Don't know why you can't. If that's your imaging division's major source of revenue, rest assured that's a top priority. APS-c/S35 is also where all the innovation lies with the big 3 (excluding m43 since canon, Nikon and Sony don't produce m43 cameras), internal 4k video, high fps stills, dual pixel AF and more are all finding their way into APS-c/S35 sensor cameras before FF. One could counter-argue FF is dying because more of the innovation is going to APS-c.

    You're pushing your own uninformed opinion as fact, when Amazon sales are in fact a measure of where the market is going. Even anecdotal stuff - what cameras are available in large retailers such as Best Buy and Walmart - low end APS-c Canon's and Nikons. FF has not seen mass adoption on the level of APS-c and it never will because costs put it out of reach of many casual users - and that's where the sales numbers lie.

    Pros make up a very, very small percentage of the market and have specialized needs that are served by small-volume niche products - hence cameras like the 1dx, D4s, FS7 and so on that use bits and pieces of other models to leverage the costs of development across multiple lines. If you have actual facts to back up your argument, and not just your opinion please provide them. 

    Cheers

  11. I have the 4k GoPro too and I can't decide whether to get one of these gimbals and defish 4k footage or get one of the larger gimbals like the Nebula or Pilotfly H1. The 4k is pretty impressive out of the GoPro, which make me think I can get by, shooting people is the only worry for me. Only thing that jumps out is the video is a little bouncy at times, gotta smooth out your steps.

  12. Because I'm bored at work, and to add a little support to why APS-c is clearly not dead, I took a quick look at the Amazon top 100 cameras - there were 33 large sensor cameras in the top 100 -- 31 were ILC's, 4 were FF, 1 was M43, and 2 were the black and silver versions of the X100t (APS-c) see the list below. APS-c clearly dominates both mirrorless and DSLR's. Its the reason why Canon and Nikon crank out new versions so often and why the bottom end E-mount cameras get such quick refreshes - that's where the biggest sales numbers lie. I'd be genuinely shocked if CaNikon wasn't selling 10 APS-c bodies to every FF body, there are just far more people buying $400 kits compared to $2500 bodies.

    Top selling ILC's with the overall ranking, asterisks precede the 5 cameras that aren't APS-c:

    6. T5 kit

    7. D3300

    8. Another T5 Kit

    9. Nex 5TL

    15. Another T5 kit

    18. D3200 Kit

    26. T5i

    28. D3300 kit

    29. Another T5 kit

    42. A6000

    44. T3i Kit

    45. 70d

    *46. 5d3

    *47. 6d

    54. T5i kit

    *56. GH4

    59. D7000

    68. D3100

    71. X100T silver

    72. D7100

    76. 70d kit

    77. T3

    79. D3300 kit

    *82. D750

    83. A3000

    85. X100T black

    86. Another T5 kit

    88. D7200

    89. D3200

    91. A6000 kit

    92. T5i kit

    *93. D810

    100. Another T5i kit

     

  13. So for photography everyone agree. 

    ​Not me and I currently own two FF and two APS-c cameras, and have owned a few m43 as well. The beauty of APS-c is that it really falls in the middle of M43 and FF -- smaller/cheaper lenses than FF, bigger sensor and higher IQ/DR than M43. APS-c isn't going anywhere, look at the Amazon rankings for ILC's, all of the top sellers are APS-c. There's a small advantage with FF in terms on noise/DR - though not much and in many cases there's no advantage at all (Canon FF vs. Sony/Samsung APS-c). DOF is really the only place FF has a clear advantage, but even then its only one stop. And geez, look at the size/price of the new FE 35. 

    FF has its advantages from an IQ standpoint, but lenses are more expensive and much larger. Depends on your needs and budget, but APS-c is the biggest part of the ILC market because it offers the best IQ (talking stills) for the money. A better test from your original post would be to put the FE 35/1.4 on the A6000 and the A7, so you're comparing two 24mp images with the same sensor bloodline. Fuji and Sony are so different because of the X-trans rendering. The A7s is the outlier in the discussion because of its crazy ISO's, but you're limited to 12mp and below 3200 it isn't anything special compared to any current FF and some APS-c sensors when you downsample the images to 12mp.

    APS-c is the midsize sedan of the ILC market - bland and boring, but sells better than any other segment.

  14. ​I think it's part of a uniquely american brand of obnoxious youth culture. Ties in with the selfie narcissism trend. 

    Stupid comment and hardly a uniquely American phenomenon. I live in The U.S., 70 million people visited my state last year including tons of selfie stick brandishing individuals from Asia, Europe and South America - most notably Japanese, British, German and Brazillian. A couple of idiots don't represent an entire country. 

  15. A 10-cent rubber bracelet or a fat rubber band (free in many cases) will cure any lens creep. I know is fashionable to bash Canon on this site, but I don't get why people have so much hatred toward this camera, nobody's forcing you to use it. Its all about the image - and if it looks great people will buy it - Canon gets the last laugh. Looking forward to seeing one in person and tinkering with it once Best Buy has it in stock.

×
×
  • Create New...