gatopardo

Something like the LS300 Virtual Scan Mapping function would be great.

15 minutes ago, The Chris said:

Lets slow the 4k/60 raw roll a bit. The em5mkII with its 14MB raws can do 50 before the buffer fills, the Pen F's raws are just over 17MB - even if they doubled the buffer size we're still only talking about ~80 frames before it fills. 4, 5 or 8 seconds isn't going to happen. And it's only S-AF, so you're only guaranteed to get one frame in focus. Thankfully its with the E-shutter, so less wear on the mechanical shutter.

Still the 24/30p bitrates are pretty nice. Everyone is talking about the 4k stuff, but the 1080p does 202mbps. Since RS on all the current 4k cameras is significantly better in HD, this could be one badass handheld cam when you just need HD as well.

3 seconds maybe. The buffer doubled the size to 3gb. IF dual card is used to clear part of it 3 seconds might be possible...

aprox. 20MB x 60= 1200 MB/s   crazy stuff . 

Does a Canon EF to m43 bodies Speedbooster XL with EF zoom lens + IBIS - do automatic focal length report? Or we have to dial the focal length every time we change the zoom for IBIS to work properly? Anyone tried it with sigma EF zooms? Thanks.

Luke hinted that already

17 minutes ago, John Brawley said:

Not sure where 60fps RAW is coming from. It's 18fps. And as far as I understand IBIS is independent of 4K. I haven't specifically checked it but I'm fairly certain that's not right. 

JB 

http://www.getolympus.com/digitalcameras/omd/e-m1-mark-ii.html?ref=CJ

"[Pro Capture H]　approx. 60 fps with selectable 15, 20, 30, 60 fps"

[Sequential shooting H]　approx. 15 fps with selectable 10-15 fps
[Sequential shooting L]　approx. 10 fps with selectable 1-10 fps
[Anti-shock sequential shooting L]　approx. 8.5 fps with selectable 1-8 fps
[Silent sequential shooting H]　approx. 60 fps with selectable 15, 20, 30, 60 fps
[Silent sequential shooting L]　approx. 18 fps with selectable 1-10, 15, 18 fps
[Pro Capture H]　approx. 60 fps with selectable 15, 20, 30, 60 fps
[Pro Capture L]　approx. 18 fps with selectable 1-10, 15, 18 fps
*When using the M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO
*Maximum sequential shooting speed may be affected by several factors including lens used, brightness, aperture, shutter speed, and ISO setting.
*When in Pro Capture mode, slower shutter speeds and flash can not be used。
*When ISO is 8000 or above, 30 fps becomes the maximum sequential shooting speed, and the actual shooting speed may become slower than the set shooting speed by a few frames per second. When using ISO Bracketing, performance will be affected at ISO 2000 or above.
*Focus and exposure are fixed at the values of the first shot when using sequential shooting H.
*Maximum sequential shooting speed is 8.5 fps for anti-shock sequential shooting L, even when set to 9 or 10 fps.

http://www.getolympus.com/digitalcameras/omd/e-m1-mark-ii.html?ref=CJ

This might be a very good camera. 

4 minutes ago, Flynn said:

I think the video looks okay but if you want really nice looking Canon video you're gonna have to get one of their cinema cameras, which is a major bummer. At least it has DPAF. 

I don't think it looks ok. Look at the mountains edges at 1:24. Just horrible. Maybe turnig down the sharpening helps. Even the EOS CLOG may help. But the footage in this video is horrible IMHO.

1 minute ago, MattH said:

Lackluster HD when viewed on a HD monitor. In 2016.  Come on man. They've got dual pixel going for it, but for me its so close yet so far.

Looks worst than the 80d... This could be a very usefull camera.... but no. just for photography...

Sensor: Effective pixels 24.2 million pixel APS-C CMOS (total number of pixels 25.8 million pixels)

Those extra pixels are used for the electronic stabilization process?

Let's see how the EOS M5 1080p is. (No hope for 4k) With the viewfinder, dual pixel AF and maybe the same sensor this can be a fun camera to use too. 

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/sketches-claimed-new-canon-eos-m5/

1 hour ago, Jimmy said:

Maybe the rumour dude just forgot to mention it... would be a ridiculous thing to leave out of the flagship model

GH line never had IBIS. Previous GX cameras have it. I think that's the way panasonic differentiates camera lines and features.  

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/news/unveiled-canon-xc15-upgraded-follow-xc10

- New color matrix profiles

- New Highlight Priority gamma that functions as an HDR setting for  high-contrast scenes

- Low-light performance has been improved

- Autofocus speed is now almost double the speed of previous versions and has three adjustable speeds.

@Mattias Burling Mattias, have you finished your LS300 review? Is it still a good option? 

@Andrew Reid Will you show us your XC10 footage made this summer? or even a re-review? 

10 hours ago, tugela said:

From what I read, the construction is somewhat flimsy. For example, the camera that The Camera Store used for their review apparently had it's lens fall off (they showed it in their annual year end summary video). So stuff like that would be remedied I expect. A "pro" camera should be able to take a certain amount of abuse and keep on ticking, and it is not clear if that is true of the XC10.

They might like a $2500 price point, but in reality the camera should be selling at around $1500, considering what it is. I expect their sales volume might be quite a bit better at that price point. I think they probably rationalized it in terms of it being a "pro" camera, when the market it should really be aiming at is the G40 crowd. With a XC15 they might structure it that way, with the old XC10 being priced in the mid 1K range, and a more "pro" version (the XC15) at the $2500 price point, much like they did with the G30/XA20/25 cameras (which were all basically the same camera, but with different levels of bells and whistles added to the shell).

It is also not consistent with their general consumer sales strategy, where they will include improvements as a motivation to buy the next model, rather than, say, do a firmware upgrade of existing products. Firmware upgrades only happen with the really high end stuff targeted at the true professional market, not the products intended for consumers.

It's no far from 1500$ http://cvp.com/index.php?t=product/canon_0565c011aa

5 hours ago, Policar said:

6720/4096=1.64 which isn't just less than 1.91. It's less than 1.7, counting rounding error.

But the whole crop business is speculation. I have no idea if it's true or not. I don't know where people are getting this information.

An 11-16mm is already a 17mm FF equivalent, anyway. Even if you were right, a 21mm FF equivalent is about 13mm on Super35, wider than the VAST majority of cinema lenses, for which even 18mm is considered an ultra wide.

Anyhow, I'm not buying this in part because I can't afford it right now. If it doesn't meet your needs, you can buy something else. But the need for an ultra ultra wide is esoteric, and your math is wrong to begin with. And we don't know if it's a crop or not anyway... I dunno, the weird codec seems like a bigger issue to me tbh.

You are right. 

XC15 (new XC10) is a possibility! : http://www.canonwatch.com/canon-xc15-camcorder-coming-soon-xc15-mention-support-page-suggests-cw4/

52 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

It is worth noting the the 1.7 crop on 4k is purely an educated guess from Andrew... people seem to be using it as a stick to beat Canon with already.... seems odd.

I don't know where that number (1.7) came from. to my calculations it's 1,91 for a 1:1 4k readout. And, if true, that's too much crop in my opinion. Even a tokina 11-16 would be a 21mm FOV that may not be wide enough. 

The MJPEG makes perfect sense in this primarily STILL images camera. Is the perfect codec to pull still images from video. I think thats why it is there.

1:1 pixel 4k is a 1,91 crop of FF area, to my calculations. more micro 4/3 than super 35mm. 

http://***URL removed***/reviews/fujifilm-x70-review/5

Jello party