Andrew Reid

I'd rather have 5K 60p RAW than 8K 30p RAW.

Canon's renaissance in video has come at a time when rather than being frozen over, hell has come to planet Earth in the form of 2020. Only a year as perverted and warped as this could bring not one, not two but three Canon hybrid cameras. Which one should you consider adding to your filmmaking life (indeed what's left of it)? New blog post: https://www.eoshd.com/news/canon-1d-x-iii-eos-r5-eos-r6-which-one-will-be-best-for-cine/

Xperia 1... 2 Who comes up with these names?!

I can indeed vouch for it and the project is alive and well Going to be interesting what happens next

There is a lot of unmotivated 'convinience' camera work out there today. I am making a 3 legged stand Tarkovsky would not use IBIS for a static shot Kubrick would not dump his Steadicam operator for a gimbal and drone. Some of the gimbal stuff is even worse than IBIS. Movement for the sake of it. No purpose. Tacky. Lazy.

It'll be good to know if the 1D X III stands up, because it'll inform the decision on the R5... So I have a 1D X Mark III on the way to test. Also having a big clear out. I think the SL2 may have to go if they can't fix it. £5300 is a lot for something that doesn't work properly. I have way too many cameras and time to get rid of the older ones that have fallen out of relevance and see what the Canon has to offer. My concern is that RAW file sizes in 8K are going to be a complete joke. I am concerned about rolling shutter. I am a bit hesitant over the low light performance too. The 4K/120p and IBIS are big attractions, but the 1D X III 4K/60p is a full pixel readout. The 120fps will be binned. And I have realised IBIS makes me a lazy shooter and I don't like the floaty look. I am going back to tripod work. The big dilemma is whether the GFX 100 justifies itself with the 1D X III around.

Impressive flamingo on his camera strap though. That lens looks perilously close to falling in. Won't matter as doesn't work with the camera in 4K anyway.

The question Leica must answer is why they feel it ok to advertise it as a professional 4K camera for £5300, but it doesn't behave like one.

Take a look here! https://www.eoshd.com/comments/forum/25-samsung-nx1-nx500-hack/ I recommend the 160 / 180Mbit mod As the NX1 records H.265, this is equivalent to H.264 4K quality at 360Mbit! I also recommend the EOSHD setup guide and LOG workflow. https://www.eoshd.com/samsung-nx1-video-settings-guide-tutorial/ As for accessories, look to see if you can get Luca's NX-L speed booster for the full frame look with Canon EF lenses. And the Samsung battery grip is pretty nice too. This camera really does hold up well today, apart from ISO 6400+ or the rolling shutter. Just keep the ISO below 3200 and use a fast lens in low light. Avoid very quick action pans! I wish Samsung would return to the market. Biggest loss of the past 10 years. PS - if you have trouble with the H.265 files try converting to ProRes with EditReady or using Blackmagic Resolve 16

FZ2000, RX10 III both good alternatives. The RX10 III has a great lens, and superb looking 240fps FZ2000 probably much improved with V-LOG. Did it get a bitrate bump along with it? The cheapest XC10 I have seen so far has been £950 on ebay. If it gets down to £700 I may revisit

Put one on an Alexa?

How is EF the future? Give me mirrorless lenses all day long It's not like people are short for good EF lenses

The buggy racing shots are my favourite.

I quite like the look of Canon's older zooms... the original 24-105 F4L and the even more past it 28-80mm F2.8-4L Pop them on an X-T4 and you have the XC-10 look with bells on and better AF too But I miss the XC10's "inventive" form factor and small size, especially the lens - which was lovely to use mechanically speaking Maybe it is worth giving the XC-10 another go if I find it cheap

I don't think the GFX 50 sensor is fast enough for 4K video readout

The actual 4K recording on my cards from the GFX 100 doesn't really look like 11K oversampled. It looks more like a modern pixel binning technique. It's a bit above the A7R IV but not as detailed as an X-T4 and there's some aliasing. So I doubt it is doing an 11K sensor output. Fuji once did a presentation on "their best solution for 4K" from the GFX 100's sensor. And it had a quad bayer pixel mix going on. If it does have 11K RAW video in the buffer before it gets downsampled on the image processor... I am sure it could be downsampled while remaining RAW data. Just as there are medium and small RAW stills options.

I like the XC-10 as a concept. But it needed a sequel. I would caution against bothering with it in 2020. Far better results can be had by putting the Fuji 18-135mm on an X-T4. Neil Matsumoto did a great review of the XC10. Have a look at the cons... https://***URL removed***/reviews/crossing-the-bridge-canon-xc10-review No Dual Pixel AF on the XC10. I found the AF to be very hesitant in 4K. It did have a decent 1080/60p mode with very capable stabilisation in that mode, but the stabilisation in 4K was nowhere near as impressive, and far less impressive than an X-T4 in 2020. Detail in 4K is a bit scratchy. Looks pixel binned even though it isn't. Low light is quite poor and stills are JPEG only. No RAW mode of any sort!! The screen is nice but the loupe a bit daft and blocks the controls. No EVF. The ND filter is quite weak, so in sunlight you need to add extra which defeats the whole point of the built in one :) Also the lens is quite slow especially at long end. But it was a concept that deserved a bigger effort from Canon and it never got it! Bit like 1D C didn't! So yeah - X-T4 a way better shot getter, with much larger S35 sensor, and optics in a different league. Ergonomically and with regards 5 axis IBIS it's also a lot nicer to use than the XC-10. The AF is far better, which is important for run & gun.

Is it Quad Bayer?

Is the Hasselblad H6D 100C RAW video still worth $35,000? 😆

The Fuji GFX 100 along with the Panasonic S1H is the most advanced mirrorless camera for video on the market at the moment. There are reports today that Fujifilm are working on a big firmware update for the GFX 100, with ProRes RAW on the list of features. NEW BLOG POST: https://www.eoshd.com/fuji/rumor-fuji-gfx-100-to-get-prores-raw-internal-recording-or-external/

LOL I'll tell you where that would have gone... 6 months with the BMPCC, then jacking it in for a C300. Blackmagic's greatest offering is Resolve. The cameras are overrated potatos that slow you down and lumber you with a horribly unergonomic rig. Shot missers. They are not in the same class as mirrorless cameras.

Blackmagic's first camera came out in the GH2 days (2012). Very people bought the GH4, GH5, A7R II, A7S II... Yeah right. In 2009 the situation was GH1 / 5D II... Those were the only choices. Two cameras!! So an affordable 2K cine Z-CAM back then would have been a big third option all on its own but in no way competing for same customers. Since 2011 most of the action has been with mirrorless and Blackmagic has been the little niche for indie filmmakers only. Until these cameras get built in EVF, proper articulated screens, IBIS and AF all in one body like a mirrorless camera, they remain sensors in a box. Different category.

You change it either on the adapter ring manually or if you put the ring into Auto at the end past F22, you get to dial the aperture on the camera jog dials instead. Only issue I find is it's very easy to knock the aperture ring on the Fringer adapter... Easy to knock it from F2.8 to F4 for example... And easy to knock it out of A mode to F22

The thing about actually finishing things got a nod and a laugh from me, I can't count how many things I've started and then left in limbo, meaning to come back later but never do. I think I am easily bored. Always looking for next idea. Nucleus nano sounds like a good idea. The S1H is a great cinema camera. It's never going to be a camcorder with AF or an effortless run & gun shot grabber. X-T4 with an 18-135 is better at that. I'd like to settle on one camera too. Would be nice 😂

No the price limit doesn't define the camera concept. The design of the camera does. Z-Cam is totally different in concept to an X-T4.