Leaderboard

You are posting tons of good things on this forum, but EOSHD is a website that is paying the price for being a rare voice for honesty in the camera press, and it has upset all the right rumours click-weasels and pathetic social media influencers... But as a result, EOSHD is being starved of oxygen - undeservedly of course. Who the hell made these idiots gatekeepers? You can help right a big wrong here. If you use the forum regularly please make sure to: - Post links to your EOSHD Forum topics around the web to invite other voices into the discussion - for example on social media sites like Reddit and on Facebook groups, and on other forums like the very large one at DPReview - Share EOSHD blog posts and articles if you find them relevant or interesting or even if you disagree with me - Begin topics on other camera forums and Disqus threads on rumors sites about the subjects featured here. Because you know what? We are one of the best and longest standing camera forums around. Let's fight back against the clickbait, AI slop and social media hype artists. Over and out. The Camera Puffin

Here is some completely unbiased coverage of Scotland’s previous meetings with Brazil.

My opinion on the buyout of Hollywood by an oligarchy mafia. https://www.eoshd.com/opinion/warner-bros-risk-talent-exodus-over-trump-ellison-deal-who-will-follow-christopher-nolan-and-jump-ship-next/

I'm talking about LOG video, it really does depend on the user more than the camera how the colours come out, especially as the modern range of gear now have a similar high level of codecs. So the Z-LOG = S-LOG = F-LOG they're all very much the same sort of thing. Whenever you see this LOG footage on YouTube, it's been graded by the user, either with a LUT or with their own grading skills in Resolve. Yet all the comments are like this... WOW the camera has great colour science, blah blah blah. And i's the same with RAW... All the sensors are now at a high level, similar dynamic range and so on. If anything they are now too good and are moving AWAY from the look of film. As for colour science... If you shoot JPEG or rec.709 video, then what the camera is doing matters far more. But in LOG they are all using a very similar wide colour gamut, and similar LOG curve, similar white balance, it is only the 8bit side that still has a big variation between Film Simulations, Photo Styles and Creative Looks. So just bear in mind next time you see footage on YouTube that the LUT is doing 99.99% of the colour you're seeing not the camera.