Jump to content

danieleciraolo

Members
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by danieleciraolo

  1. 21 hours ago, jpfilmz said:

    Ne ho presa una la scorsa settimana e alla fine sono riuscita a provarla. In effetti estende i tempi di registrazione e mantiene la fotocamera più fresca. Con la ventola impostata al massimo in un interno di 75 gradi sono stato in grado di registrare su una scheda CF Express da 512 GB 3 volte con uno spegnimento per surriscaldamento ma per interrompere il test. Sono circa 78 minuti di registrazione grezza 8k. L'icona Temp si è accesa circa a metà della registrazione della seconda scheda e rimane accesa ma la fotocamera non si spegne. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    What CFexpress did you use? 

  2. 19 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

    È così strano.

    Può registrare 8K su schede SD molto più lente e più fredde e surriscaldarsi ugualmente velocemente, quindi il supporto non è la causa principale del surriscaldamento, vero?

    O forse lo era dopotutto?

    Bought and tested with my r5 with latest firmware ... heats the same. I don't understand the user above how he made unlimited raw recordings! This is wrong information. I send it back immediately ... I already have 2 cf express 512 the chamber heats up as with the cf express. If you buy it to avoid overheating forget it, it heats the same.

  3. 1 hour ago, HansD said:

    Per vedere se esiste una soluzione più economica rispetto alla scheda CFexpress di tipo B per Canon EOS R5, ho acquistato il convertitore CFexpress su SSD da Zitay.
    E un'unità SSD Samsung 980 Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 separata da 2 TB.

    In totale, è ancora molto più economica, ad esempio, di una scheda CFexpress Sony Tough 512 GB (per me 6,2 volte in termini di capacità di archiviazione).

    Ora posso riprendere filmati RAW 8K fino al limite di 29:59 minuti senza ricevere un avviso di surriscaldamento!

    _GDL0770_zitay.jpg

    Can you show me how you close the card slot with this adapter? Can you post a picture? thank you.

  4. I have the r5 and I work with a macpro 2009 with 12 cores and a macbook pro 15 8 cores, surely I have no real time but with final cut I do the proxies for the mounting the color I do it with davinci when the job is finished and I have no problems ( 8k raw, ipb and 4k 120 fps)

  5. Ninja V+ and 8K workflow
    We are also delighted to announce that the Ninja V+ will be able to record 8Kp30 ProRes RAW when
    connected to a Canon EOS R5 mirrorless camera.
    Atomos and Canon are delighted to be bringing customers a world first for capturing stunning pristine
    8K images with such an affordable, capable and compact camera system. This will be a true game
    changer in content creation.
    The ProRes RAW format is a perfect vehicle for an 8K workflow, from ease of use natively on the
    timeline within Final Cut Pro, to the flexibility of the image processing with full adjustment of WB and
    ISO control.
    Coupled with the proven Full Frame Canon EOS R5, this combination will propel content creators to a
    whole new level of production values. Coming later in 2021.

  6. I have not seen a serious test where you can see that the a7s3 has more dynamic range than the r5 ... the only tests I have seen are fake where they compared the r5 with no log activated, and no comparison with r5 raw video. I'm not talking about numerical tests ... but about real situations with a lot of contrast. In this test they claim that the a7s3 has less video dynamic range than the r5. https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Test/Canon-EOS-R5-Firmwareupdate-1-3-0--Canon-Log-3--Cinema-Raw-Light-und-IPB-Light-in-der-Praxis.html

  7. I have not seen a serious test where you can see that the a7s3 has more dynamic range than the r5 ... the only tests I have seen are fake where they compared the r5 with no log activated, and no comparison with r5 raw video. I'm not talking about numerical tests ... but about real situations with a lot of contrast. In this test they claim that the a7s3 has less video dynamic range than the r5. https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Test/Sony-FX3-vs-Canon-EOS-R5-im-Vergleich---welche-Kamera-wofuer--Hauttoene--Autofokus--Aufloesung--uvm----Videoaufloe.html

  8.  

    Hi Andrew I advise you to do new tests with the new firmware ... now the overheating is sensitive to temperatures ... I shot half a day in the cellar with temperatures of 12 degrees and I had no overheating, always running at 120 fps, this guy has demonstrated that by putting the fans and cooling the area of the cards can run without overheating ... even when the light appears after the ventilation goes off and continues to record.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K5HG1rlnVc

  9. Today I shot all morning in a wine cellar .. with temperatures around 12 degrees ... surely they changed something since I always shot at 100 frame takes of 2/3 minutes and when I stopped it always gave me the maximum time (7 min  and 30 sec).  No time offer available.  So I implemented the temperature control on the new firmware ... I modified mine that I withdrew yesterday from the cps in addition to replacing the circuit that controls the power supply that was gone

  10. Canon su please the customers who bought the camera you advertised as 8k and 4k 120 fps and lift the stupid recording limits !! Leave the 15 minutes x 8k and 10/7 min for 4k 120 ..... but eliminate the waiting times to have a few more minutes of recording !! make it always available to shoot 8k and 4k 120, 4k hq without ever having to turn off the camera !!! But only if a room actually reaches 80 C ° if used in too hot environments !!! Make your customers happy who have been using canon for a lifetime and have been waiting for this room at last with innovative and valid functions !! After you have castrated all the cameras on the video department from the 5d mk3 !!!! Update this firmware and eliminate the wait times and add 240 fps in full hd and clog 2 and 3!!! Pleaseeeeeeeeee

  11. 10 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

     

    Tutti coloro che hanno speso $ 4000 per questa fotocamera (o anche di più in molte regioni) hanno diritto a una spiegazione onesta, a scuse e sicuramente a una soluzione.

     

     

    Hi Andrew thanks for your work, I spent a lot more than 4000 $ !!! I bought R5 + 4 batteries, adapter ef -r, 2 cf express san disk 512gb, total 6670 euros !!!! And I mostly work with videos !! It is absurd that I find myself having a room advertised as 8k !! and to work without problems I have to use a poor 4k !!! Canon be ashamed !!! And I hope that all the owners join in a class action to ask for these limitations to be lifted and for canon to pay !!! They are just stupid! even for their speakers !! how many people like me work with videos and photos and spend almost 7000 euros to work with videos and photos and don't want cinema eos because they don't take photos !!! Canon is up to be stupid and free all the potential of this camera !!!

×
×
  • Create New...