Clovis

Indeed ! How come ?? I saw the video has (only) 23,98 fps. I would expect more jitter here and there ...

To my eyes too, this looks very pleasing. It is a relief that after all the harsh contrasty low light footage coming out of the GH5s, also this the GH5s can deliver. Great ! Only, I see a total absence of motion blur ...

Very true jagnje. Yes, indeed living in a PAL-country. It is just that the combo 400Mbps, 4:2:2 10-bit ALL-Intra (very appealing as a codec) and 25p in [C4K] 4096x2160 isn't available on the GH5s, even though I think it could be possible. It should be included in a next firmware update.

Hi all, I really hope someone at Panasonic reads this. If they can do [C4K] 4096x2160, 59.94p, 150Mbps (4:2:0 8-bit LongGOP) and [C4K] 4096x2160, 24.00p, 400Mbps (4:2:2 10-bit ALL-Intra), would it be possible to do [C4K] 4096x2160, 25.00p, 400Mbps (4:2:2 10-bit ALL-Intra) ? C'mon, 1 tiny little frame more ...

But, but ... I know one or two things about getting a cinematic look out of these hybrids. It's just almost everyone filming with the GH5s in the dark. Ok if that is great, but there is more. I wonder what can be drawn out of it when using a good cinelens combined with a speedbooster and those values set to -5. That video from Wex Photo Video filmed in Slovenia is about the only one up to now going a bit in that direction.

Concerning the Panasonic GH5s, they speak in terms of "master of darkness", "low light monster" and what not. But what are its credentials when there is light ? Test films of the GH5 can be found that look pleasing, even cinematic. Not so for the GH5s, up to now. Most test films look ... eh ... overcontrasted, video-ish, harsh. This is a call to dial back to -5 those NR, sharpness numbers and film in broad daylight. So, can the GH5s also deliver "cinematic" footage ? It would help me in a great way to see this answered, when choosing between the GH5 and the GH5s. Thanks.