howard

"LOL" I guess I wasn't the only one feeling like what several have mentioned when I was reading this thread.

Here is a link to a similar set up. Not exactly the 24-70mm but he used the canon 35mm f2 and the 70-200mm f4. He got some great shots with these lenses.

Hello, I currently own a Canon 24-70mm 2.8 mark i and the Canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS. I have decided to get the GH5, but before I make the order, I have several questions I would like to ask for advice. 1. Should I keep my current lenses and buy the Speed booster? XL or Ultra? I inherited these lenses so not sure how good they are. 2. How well does Stabilization and Auto Focus work with the Speed Booster and Canon lenses on GH5 compared to native lenses or other lenses? 3. Would it be better to sell my lenses and get a different setup? if so, which would you recommend? Get native lenses or other lenses with Speed booster? If I keep my Canons, my budget will be just for the Speed Booster. But if I sell them, I'll have around an extra $2,000 dollars for lenses. I will be mostly shooting for music videos. I really liked these videos. He is using the Panasonic Leica 25mm 1.4 Panasonic Leica 42.5mm 1.2 Olympus 75mm 1.8 What do you think about it? Thanks in advance! -Howard

That would be awesome thank you! I"m sure there are a lot of people out there that would love to see the comparison as well. ^_^

Man all these awesome footages... I am really having a hard time trying to decide if I want to get the GH5 or the Mark 3 with ML. What would you guys get? I wish there was a GH5 vs Mark 3 ML raw 14bit comparison somewhere. All the Mark 3 footage looks spectacular and it may be due to the footages being shot by more professionals compared to the footages shot by GH5 users who are more non-professionals. I have seen some GH5 stuff that are really good, but it seems most are just vloggers or casual enthusiasts doing camera tests that they post up on youtube or vimeo. Anyways, it would be really great if there was such a comparison video of the two cameras.