Marco Tecno

Sandro, something like that has been tried before with no luck, but one more attempt would not harm. There should be two 'sections', one with suggestions, one with bugs. Ppl should be able to upvote, so to change the order of priorities in the list.

It is important that both our written suggestions and your video reach someone at samsung.

If fhd is now 60mb at 30p, I'd want uhd (and fhd 120p) at 240mb!!! Please samsung....

And if it's feasible, I'd like 10bit as an option.

Nice, thx! Nx1 is great and with fw 1.3 it is now greater :-) 

Still lot of good suggestions/fixes to implement:

Come on Samsung, make us customers happier and happier!

They should also add 10bit video at 100+mb/sec both in fhd and uhd.

There was a very big list of suggestions in the thread about fw 1.21! Most were not implemented yet...

I think it's 1.3 not 1.31. It should be the reworked fw rumored some days ago, let's hope it really improves af as mentioned. Nx1 totally needs this.

P.s. I don't see mention about lossy raw alternative for stills (present in nx500). Too bad if not there.

Also, not many featuresfeatures/improvements that we requested long time ago through Andrew. :-( 

Sandro: nx1 is a great camera. Last week a friend with a 7d almost started crying, after seeing how my nx1 performs.

Btw, I'm Italian as well. Feel free to pm me if you want.

As an owner of nx1, I would NOT buy the lx version, since at 70-80% I use it to take pics, and the more mp are great for cropping and 'digital zooming'.

I'd like more dr from the nx1, but with the same mp count or even higher.

I guess my next camera will have to be 8k (and 4k@120fps), to make me really desire it. Nx1-mk2 in two years? ;-) 

The nx1 does that from 28mp. With no fans...

Actually, 10bit in 4k for nx1 and higher bitrate would be overdue, along with log.

200mb/s in h.265 could keep a lot of iq and dr at 10bit, and would only require an sd able to write at about 30MB/sec (with overhead). Nx1 can do almost 60MB/sec in I/O.

I wonder if the hw encoder can reach 10 bit, though.

Here you can find many other suggestions:

Imo the first consumer big sensor camera with 8k will be from samsung and will come in 2 years or a bit less. I may be wrong of course.

Andrew sent our list of suggestions to samsung. Perhaps he could have some insight about this?

Really nice! Graded or ooc?

After the review on dpr, I guess the nx1 is gaining momentum again.

But they need a fw update now. Too many things to be improved/fixed, to really turn heads.

Too bad they didn't even add lossy raw compression to nx1 as an alternative. This has been present in nx500 for weeks.

It'd have been nice if Andrew could be part of that review for the video side of nx1. Anyway a fair review, even if imo the nx1 could achieve 90% like d750 did (it has slightly lower iq for high iso stills, but has many more features).

Mattias: 1100€ for new or used? If new, you probably got the best deal I ever heard on nx1. I paid 1.225€ shipped, a bit more than two months ago, and that was about 150€ lower than the second best deal I could find.

Eric (a guy posting on dpr) did some tests on the lenses, and those resulted in the lenses covering at most an aps-h sensor size.

Yes I remember that rumor. Then there was a counter rumor saying that the price would stay still till summer. Instead now it went down of about 20%. We'll see how things go, but personally I had thought that nx1 could be 'different' than previous nx.

I think it'd be too early to get a new nx1 model, but everything is possible with samsung. I'm just happy that I found a nice price on nx1 two months ago, similar to the present one. Otherwise I'd be so upset, now.

Perhaps samsung will finally release a new fw for nx1 achieving similar features as the half priced nx500? They seem to have forgotten they have a flagship product to continuously develop (as they stated at launch...).

We collected a lot of suggestions for new fw, but since then...nothing.

My idea is that the algorithms in nx1 could be further enhanced by samsung. From the link I shared in another thread, it is evident how in stills, iso 100 pushed ahead of 6 stops is better than internal iso 6400 on nx1.

Hence there is a potential dr in the raw image captured by the sensor at base iso which is NOT achieved either in internal high iso raw, or in encoded video.

The fact is that with nx1 it seems to be better shooting at iso 100 with -6ev, rather than shooting at 6400 with 0ev of compensation. Much more chroma noise at 6400, less details and ugly patterns of luminance noise, looking like something going on high iso raw, like a sort of (very bad) nr.