Jump to content

Tito Ferradans

Members
  • Posts

    782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tito Ferradans

  1. I gotta get back my 0.25 diopter to test this!

    Along the last year I've read multiple times that diopters between the anamorphic and taking lens would not work properly... I just got confused about maximum focusing distance (maybe I missed a line or so of what he said). It's limited within the diopter range, right?

     

    ps - the LA7200 also performs very well combined with Canon 16-35mm f/2.8

  2. So why did you want to rehouse it and make it double focus.?

     

    just askin'   :)

     

    Hahahaha, good point.

     

    I like it the way it is, I just think it can be improved (like almost anything else, even Iscos). And not so much "double focus" on the rehousing, but more of a "variable focus through" where the focus range isn't so limited without the diopters, nor so picky like a regular double focus lens. According to tests, you can 'set' the Panny to focus from X to Y meters, and rack focus only with the taking lens. :P

  3. 2) And then the other thing is when I'm testing my own anamorphics, the source light just off frame produces an intense purple flare (almost opaque) at the frames edge in addition to the normal flares I'm used to.  Where's that purple flare coming from?  My anamorphic or the taking lens?  I was using a Helios and a Kowa 16-S.

     

    Hey Erik!

     

    Kowas and Sankors are particularly famous for their vignetting when light sources are pointed directly inside it, because the inner parts of the body reflect the light and end up showing in the frame.

     

    (please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading about this on another thread, and getting results from personal testing)

  4. If I'm not mistaken, you should be safe from 85mm up on the 5D3 if you intend to use the WHOLE 3.56:1 image. If you're going to crop the sides to 2.4:1, then you can go with 55mm and up. :)

×
×
  • Create New...