[quote author=sandro link=topic=98.msg943#msg943 date=1324997502]
that the dynamic range is worse there's no doubt since it's a smaller sensor, but that it resolves more resolution is real
[/quote]
You are confusion sharpening with resolution. Sorry about the different FOV:s. Also the hx9v at f3.3 has extremely deep dof. :
Hx9v (no settings to adjust, you can see a lot of sharpening halos):
[url=http://hmcindie.pp.fi/hx9v/Sony_hx9v_1.jpg]http://hmcindie.pp.fi/hx9v/Sony_hx9v_1.jpg[/url]
Canon 7d (sharpened, iso 1250 at f6)
[url=http://hmcindie.pp.fi/hx9v/Canon_7d_iso_1250_sharpened.jpg]http://hmcindie.pp.fi/hx9v/Canon_7d_iso_1250_sharpened.jpg[/url]
Canon 7d (no sharpening)
[url=http://hmcindie.pp.fi/hx9v/Canon_7d_iso_1250_no_sharpening.jpg]http://hmcindie.pp.fi/hx9v/Canon_7d_iso_1250_no_sharpening.jpg[/url]
Sony hx9v also has horrible compression. Very bad. 1080p50 here in pal-land. It breaks up even in moderate movement with macroblocks everywhere. Movement doesn't even have to be that high. The 7d actually holds up pretty ok with fast motion. I can only guess what a hacked gh2 looks like. Have one on order but enjoying my 7d in the meantime.
The macroblocking and shots of detailed areas that are in motion always go into a mush because of the compression on the hx9v. Huge oversharpening artefacts.
I shot a lot of acrobatic movements with the Canon 7d and when I used the hx9v...it just looked all around worse. Though one absolutely amazing thing with the HX9v is that it's always in my pocket :)