Andrew - EOSHD

Only if the beans are cryptocurrency based.

What about the 1D X Mark III? Internal Canon RAW on a DSLR. It's definitely closest to 5D3 RAW in terms of image

Correction. YOUTUBE.

It's £7200 on eBay I could go to £6900 for the forum.

Nice to see you here again Dave! Yeah, bet the AF is better on the Olympus too!! It makes for a great run & gun video lens. I have the 15mm F1.7 as well, that is far smaller. They should make a rotating turret with 3 tiny primes on it instead! LOL!

The 100 megapixel beast is up on eBay https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/124729378713 I need the money for a house move in Berlin! I'll be sorry to see her go. Very lightly used, due to the pandemic. Was bought about 1 month before it started! I have tried the 100S as well and prefer the GFX 100 - it's just plain better in terms of build quality and the EVF. I am also selling my Leica SL2, so let me know if any takers for that.

Judging RAW from YouTube at 7Mbit/s = complete nonsense anyway!

Yes you can just substitute with Cine2 and S-Gamut on that camera. Cheers!

Often the digital look of video is because of clipped highlights and crushed shadows. A sudden step from detailed shadows to sudden black or missing details in highlights are often a sign that the full luminance range of your camera file is being clipped by the hardware you use to edit and playback footage. More info here: https://www.eoshd.com/dynamic-range-enhancer-H264-H265/

It was just the monochrome art presets in Adobe Camera Raw. They're pretty decent.

HDMI was never an issue was it? I'm a bit hazy on the details now as I sold my EOS R5 and won't be buying another Canon for a while. R3 looks tempting though.

Yeah seems strange to me. Approach with caution. It's a janky ass solution anyway.

They are both extremely good in low light, S5 perhaps even more so to my eye. Haven't done anything scientific in terms of testing the dual gain yet. Good idea for a blog post though.

Yeah the diffused light you get with the Pro Mist filters really helps on digital to take the edge off. I find the S1H, S5 have edge over A7S III so far for me in terms of image quality. Thicker files. It is just a shame they put such a small EVF on the S5 it really ruins manual focus.

The Rokkors even stand up on medium format. Damned good glass and best ever for the money. One of my favourite posts about this: https://jonasraskphotography.com/2017/08/16/minolta-x-fujifilm/ The later A-mount Minolta autofocus stuff ain't bad either. They really were pioneering trailblazers in the 80s, with lenses like the 35mm F1.4 G

If the value isn't there as much why are the rocketing in price? It's due to rarity. Plus the fact that most modern lenses just look boring and clinical. They are all obsessed with making bright corners and sharpness that makes your eyes bleed! Leica M lenses vignette like hell and it's all part of their charm.

Plus adapters to EF. Amazing I know! 😆

Do you have a source for this or are you making stuff up?

This is so strange. It can record 8K to much slower cooler SD cards and still overheat just as quick, so the media isn't the primary cause of the overheating is it? Or maybe it was after all?

Thanks I'll check it out.

LOG shouldn't be noisier, you're just seeing more of the noise in the shadows. After grading, all that should go back to normal. Shooting LOG in low contrast situations where there's just a narrow band of luminosity in the scene - I'd agree with you there, but then you may still need to match colour to the daytime scenes with a specific LUT. Sometimes you do need a wide dynamic range in low light at ISO 3200 as well, there might be a brightly lit interior in the shot or bright street lights. Definitely ETTR in low light. Better to select a high ISO especially with a dual gain sensor, than to under expose at say, 400, and ramp up the shadow noise in post.

Interesting points of view there. Apart from the ghosting problem, how did you find the Sigma 28-70? Is the rendering clinical or quite nice? Bokeh busy, or smooth and cinematic? I understand they took a lot of weight out of the lens, so how's the build quality and feel - does it feel light and plasticy? The original Fp is getting most of the firmware features of the new cam so that's the one to stick to for video I think. I wonder where Sigma go next with the Fp? Maybe bring a new camera out based on the larger SD Quattro body with more controls and mechanical shutter, plus articulate that damn screen!

Some picture profiles like S-LOG have a high minimum ISO - say 1600 on some cameras. But that isn't the case with Pro Color and you exposure it as normal. It won't affect the RAW stills, just video and JPEGs. I am working on a version for RAWs, as Sony's RAW presets in Adobe Camera Raw and the Adobe ones don't bring out the best results either a lot of the time!

This the L-mount version I take it?

] You can now shoot Pro Color on the latest Sony Cameras such as the A7S III and it has been comprehensively updated for all existing models. This is a universal release, so no need to download a certain version of Pro Color to match your model any more. This one works on all cameras even those without Picture Profiles like the A9. Hope you enjoy it, looking forward to seeing your footage. Any thoughts or feedback, please feel free to comment! https://www.eoshd.com/eoshd-pro-color-5/