Davide DB

In the Alps, for clickbaiting purposes, they are still pushing the idea that it is an l-mount camera. ATM the most credible option is that it's just the S1R 🤣 That youtuber has also an S1R and he was trying the Blazar lens with ND filter on it. So the blurred camera (that he confirmed it will revealed next week) could be anything

In the Alps, they are saying that the compact blurry camera could be the new DJI or even a Panasonic (!), because the lens adapter that is visible is a Viltrox PL-L-Mount. They're going crazy 🤪

OMG! What you just reminded me of!

This really struck me. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vincentsmadja_when-fashion-holds-its-breath-several-activity-7368221093104472064-NL9v

Nor the camera in the photos. 6K@raw in that fan-less small body? Did they do a miracle putting a fan inside that? The German author of the video assured that it's a new camera but not a Canon. WHo knows. According to rumors, in few week we will have: - Canon C50 - Nikon ZR - DJI FF (Maybe) What a mess 🙂

And finally we will discover that it's the DJI 😄

https://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/blurred-images-of-the-new-canon-c50/ Edit: if that one is a VND, then...

The rumors seem to be sure that it's full-frame, 33MP, has an Open Gate, and has RAW. It's funny that there was a short circuit between the rumor sites. Andrea Pizzini's sites got the information first, and the Canon Rumors site had to play catch-up. All the info on a Canon camera was on the Sony rumors site. The Canon rumors site seems like Pravda, a direct mouthpiece for Canon (who isn't today?)

"Why I jumped to Canon" What a time to be alive!

And cameras

You probably didn't waste time reading the various links in the article, but I understand if you hate the person. By the way, the accusations are so serious that if they were false, they could take him to court in an instant, but let's not get into that; it's not my place to defend Cory Doctorow here. Indeed, this statement is a bit strong and, said like that, seems absolutely false. But, following the various links to his previous articles, I believe he was referring to his old article: Tesla sells both 60kWh and 75kWh versions of its Model S and Model X cars; but these cars have identical batteries — the 60kWh version runs software that simply misreports the capacity of the battery to the charging apparatus and the car’s owner. https://memex.craphound.com/2017/09/10/teslas-demon-haunted-cars-in-irmas-path-get-a-temporary-battery-life-boost/ BTW, you were complaining that all of this has nothing to do with my initial post. It absolutely does. In both cases, there's a distortion of the concept of property. In the first case, the major music labels do you the favor of letting you listen to "their" music. In the case Andrew cited, Bloomberg claims to have the copyright even on a POTUS speech. In the magical world of subscription, you don't own a f*** thing and they can revoke everything at any moment. In all cases, you are only enabled to consume. Maybe it's too left-wing? And yet the strong concept of private property and possession of a good doesn't come from there. Ciao

I think this post is enough to understand where we are headed. Adobe's subscription model is laughable in comparison. https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/15/musklemons/

The pattern is always the same: silencing those who are inconvenient to you through supposed copyright violations or lawsuits, knowing full well that 99% of the time, the people affected don't have the means or the funds to defend themselves. This is also a classic pattern in journalism here in The Banana Republic Of Italy. The big company or industrial group, or even the wealthy politician, sues the journalist. Anyway, they have a host of lawyers already on salary, and even if they lose the lawsuit, the amount doesn't even slightly affect their budget.

No further words

If they commit to it, they'll be able to make a camera comparable to the S1II, with which share the sensor. But it's Nikon, and it will be a huge success.

Could you show me some of your a.i. works? IDK if with a.i. it's the same like ordinary filmmakers which make reels... Or could you show me some pro work made with a.i.?

What kind of job was it? Can you talk about it?

And most importantly it has a "MADE IN JAPAN" marking on its side 😉 An artisan next to Hattori Hanzo's shop makes it by hand.

Its lens hood is just 198 USD https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/907015-REG/Sony_LHP_1_Lens_Hood.html

Or a new LX10, or bette lr a GM 1with rhe latest Lumix technology

Speaking of new cameras... This was shot by a friend of mine on a "vintage" Lumix LX10 in Nauticam housing and different wet diopters.

We are two divers, one GH5MII in a Nauticam Housing and a GH5S in Aquatica housing.

60p cropped, HDMI RAW cropped. The S5IIx is the better choice—but I really want to see what all those shilltubers out there will have to say.

Latest Google Veo3