Arheo

that is exactly why i dont like footage made with canon r5 and like one made with Bmpcc. Later have much more charm...

Yea like pixelpreaching notice, i plan to use my L lenses. if i buy 4k or have to buy metabones or new lenses. Eaven if left aside money for new lenses, dragging two complets od lenses 🙄 . I have some nice canon lenses like 35/1.4L mkI, 85/1.2L II, 200/2.8 L and one zoom 24-70/4 L with really good stabilisation. Also i have Leica summicron 50/2 with ef adapter , I sold my old 17-40L recently, and if take bmpcc 6k, i will only need one wide angle lens, and i am complet 😄 and offcourse, I really want to thanks all you people for helping me with advice... specialy @pixelpreaching for spending his time to write well elaborated post. For now i am closer to option buying Blackmagic 6k and keeping 5DIV. but still in big dilemma... (my head will explode... 🤯 )

and what about canon L lenses...how much its impact on contrasty look? I see really nice cinematic footage made with bmpcc 6k and quality vintage lenses, like Leica or Contax zeiss.

thanks all!!! my choice on bmpcc 6k (and keeping canon 5dIV) or canon r5 (and selling 5dIV) are conditioned by budget and to have good photographic tool. My budget, what i plan to invest in equipment is about 2000eur. sony 7sIII is out of my budget if keep canon 5dIV. I know that it isnt enough to buy only body of Bmpcc 6k, but battery, rig.... and another problem with bmpcc is gimbal, if i am understood corrrect, it is not easy to balance on gimbal!? Canon r5 can easy put on gimbal,have ibis and 4k 120fps are great. But i really hate big video files of canon. On some way i more like colors and contrast of blackmagic cameras. I am not sure how to explain but after watch videos of both i think that canon are more contrasty and blackmagic more soft...

I am photographer for a almost 15 years...using canon mainly. Last few year work with canon 5DIV and few L lenses (35L, 85L, 200L, 24-70IS). For a last 4-5 year I start to interest in videography...learn a lot...working mainly with panasonic gh5. Last summer I sold panasonic and continue to sporadicly work video with canon 5dIV. I want to go step further in my cinematography production and thinking about upgrading equipment. I have two option: 1) to buy Blackmagic pocket 6K and keep 5dIV OR 2) to sell 5dIV and buy R5. (if i calculate correct i will spend same amount of money in both way). I like color and look that produce Bmpcc 6k...but if pick it, i will have two camera to take with me. With Canon r5 whole set up will be lighter plus i will have ibis. I need advice for experienced cinematographers. Plan is to continue to work stock video and to realise some of my idea and make few movies (mainly documentary).

yea there are a little took about this type od stabilisation. what i am interested, as hybrid IS is introduces in 2009, how lens with hybrid IS like 24-70/L IS compare to new lens like 24/2.8is 35/is 24-05II. are fotage with 24-70is more steady than with 24IS?

I have a lot of L primes for my canon 5dIV. it is great for photo, but if i want to make video i have to use tripod or gimbal. So i decide to bay lens with IS to use it for handheld video. First thinking about primes 24IS or 35IS. BUT then I hear that lens with macro capability like 24-70/4IS, 100L IS, ef-s 35IS have something canon call "Hybrid IS" and that it is more effective for hand held video shoo than regular IS. I try to research this subject but without success. Are Hybrid IS (introduced 2009) implement only in macro lens or all new lenses use the same technolgy? Are Hybrid IS really better for handheld video? Now i am in doubt should 24-70/4L be more useful for handhelded video than 24is or 35is?