Jump to content

pbetancourt

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    pbetancourt got a reaction from Francola in Adobe shambles - Why subscription software should be illegal   
    I've been using FCPX from day one. Many features were missing at that moment. But today, I just don't understand why people is still using Premiere. Maybe it's all about the magnetic timeline, which seems to be a headache for editors coming from fcp7, Avid or Premiere. For new editors instead, it seems to be that learning fcpx is much easier. 
    FCPX stills lacks from many things, as well as Premiere does. I miss warp stabilizer (a lot) and a more powerfull tracking tool, but overall I find it much more powerful, faster, and intuitive than Premiere. And, almost, bug free. It's just a joy to use, like using a camera you love. I still need to open Premiere Pro for stabilizing some footage or convert some projects from colleagues. It feels like opening a computer with Windows 95. 
    For photos I just miss Aperture a lot too. Lightroom is so slow and the interface so bad that I just use camera raw instead. But I'll try to learn Capture One.
    Photoshop it's still my main software for photo retouching, unfortunately.
     
     
     
  2. Like
    pbetancourt reacted to cameraeye in Adobe shambles - Why subscription software should be illegal   
    Lately I've been missing Aperture- not for the image processing results but for the workflow and interface. For me its more intuitive and faster than Lightroom. I started looking for Lightroom alternatives and so far I haven't found anything better, but more importantly anything close to what I liked about Aperture. I haven't test-driven everything, though.
    Hope there's an alternative or someone makes one leaning towards Aperture design- Lightroom is clunky and slow.
×
×
  • Create New...