greenscreen

4 hours ago, Mattias Burling said:

I suggest not feediing them for a while and we will see what happens.Bots and paid trolls are usually an impatient bunch.

Really? Dan Wake same page too? Your move?? Easy way to bash criticism. 

26 minutes ago, jpfilmz said:

Agreed...This thread has descended into complaining and cry baby whining.

Whining?

Easy way to put a gag when criticism doesn't match the color of the team.

10 minutes ago, A_Urquhart said:

Not really sure what you mean by this. 

Yes, I like the camera because i knew exactly what it was going to be and it has lived up to that expectation. I'm not going to hate on it because it doesn't have a tilting screen because i knew it wasn't going to have one. I'm also not going to hate on it because it doesn't have continuous AF or  IBIS because A: I don't need those features and B: I knew the camera was never going to have those features. I defend the camera against unrealistic people just because I am interested in the conversation relating to the camera and am quite dumb founded that people would find the need to get on a thread about a camera they do not want and does not meet their needs and start arguing about it. 

It's like me getting on the Sony A7III thread and ranting and raving about the fact that it doesn't do RAW or 10bit. Just sillyness!

I'm trying to give people some perspective but people just want to bang on about why it doesn't have feature A or B that a mirrorless camera does have. 

I wonder if Emanuel or Dbounce works for Sony or Panasonic as they are constantly on here bashing the Pocket for not being what it was never intended to be. Why are they so intent on bashing a camera they have not interest in? Andrew has been very vocal about the X-T3 and despite years of interest in RAW, now thinks the X-T3 is the ducks nuts, does he now work for Fuji?

So much ridiculousness....it's quite staggering.

Really? Emanuel is praising the camera. I follow his posts.

Humm well the owner of the site suspects about your love. Nothing against you, I like Australians. You should hear the other side. I didn't read anyone to be pointless here, howbeit you defend the camera as banal as barking dogs. This is ridiculous. 

1 minute ago, A_Urquhart said:

Yep, It would seem that the trolls have been released!

Really? To me, it would seem you're here to sell the camera. I am being honest with you.

5 minutes ago, Vladimir said:

 

*please watch in 4K quality only, theres a lot of dark red environment  and yt compression is wild

 

Too wild. Thank you. Worths to watch. 

3 minutes ago, shooter said:

Doesn't exist. That's my line. haha I don't expect things to be free. The free version exists yes or no? You guys embarrass yourselves. This marketing is very weird.  

I can't support this way of doing business. We want to read unbiased people. What fanboys talk? This is Walmart!  

1 minute ago, Danilo Del Tufo said:

I'm not sure that Pocket has tap-to-focus, what I've understood is that it has just a square at the center of the image pressing the autofocus button.

Hope for more than only that.

Impressive launch indeed. Anything new since NAB?

Impressive filmography by the way.

It is 199! Pity not similar bargain but for 4K!

Very interesting discussion. Great forum. I and my family partners we are in the middle of a single doubt. GH5S or only GH5? I see some people see GH5S like an extra expense. I have heard and read GH5 low light can be very good without difference for GH5S up to 1600 ISO. It seems the only trouble is when we go beyond 3200 ISO. We also can use fast lenses. Should we wait for the new A7S3?