François Albaranes
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by François Albaranes
-
-
Thanks guys for the replies.
Yes, to me as well sharing and showing what you can achieve with the not-best cameras is what we all have to do.
Instead I usually see in forums people compare/complain and ask for more, but I'm never allowed to see what they produce with - let's face it - cameras that can do much better than pro-cinema/hollywood cameras from the '90s.Yes I used MFT for budget reasons, and I can say I am very happy to have achieved that film with only a G85, pana lenses and 1000€. MFT lenses are very good and sharp (i had to add blur in post to give a more cine look), but they can't give you the shallowest DOF. Skin tones are worse than what more pro cameras can give you, but color grading can change the game and the audience doesn't care about that kind of things (if job is properly done).
Project after project it becomes pretty clear that STORY is paramount, and then SOUND design.
-
18 hours ago, KnightsFan said:
No problem! I enjoyed watching it.
And for the gear... The thickness of the color and richness of the shadow tones was very good. The blue jacket at 9:55 for example popped out. I thought the last scene on the boat looked a lot like some more stylized film stocks. I thought the boat shots stood out as the best in terms of color. If I had to guess I'd say XT3 with Sigma Art lenses. But whatever you used it was consistent and did the job well.
Thank you very much!
About gear, I used micro four third stuff. A Panasonic G85 with Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm f2.8, 15mm f1.7 and 42.5mm f1.2. I used Magic Bullet Looks in Premiere Pro and a LUT that's called "AriColour 4k Cine Pop". Changed the tint and colours hue to get more reddish skin tones, blurred a bit (as m4/3 is way too sharp) and added grain.
This radically changed the look of the film.That's interesting to see that you can get good results without cinema lenses and a high end camera.
-
On 12/18/2019 at 11:19 PM, KnightsFan said:
That was really well done! I liked the unassuming and consistent pace, and the overall production value was quite good. I appreciate how the conflict is introduced in the very first scene, but is implied and veiled. The movie hides the conflict the way Paul is burying his own emotions. I do think, though, that for the runtime, there is too much buildup and not enough payoff. Part of that is that the moment of confrontation between the two men is the weakest part. There is no leadup to Paul falling, it's just a shot of a foot slipping out of nowhere, and then there is no visceral "punch" when Paul hits the ground. And then suddenly Emilie's there. I think that's the part that kind of harms the payoff for me, there's no connection between Paul and Emilie and then suddenly there is, with no story element to explain the resolution (unless I missed something, which is possible).
Thank you very much KnightsFan ! I appreciate a lot your analysis.
-
Hi there !
This is my last (self produced) short film.
I'm wondering if you can guess the gear used for this one... ?Thanks for watching ?
- KnightsFan and PannySVHS
- 2
-
44 minutes ago, IronFilm said:
It is very good! Glad you joined up to the forums now This site is a great resource!
Thanks ! I've been coming there for months but hadn't registered yet.
-
10 hours ago, IronFilm said:
Thanks for sharing my film IronGuy !
It was shot with the G7 and 12-35mm f2.8 & 42.5mm f1.7 lenses. Graded with Magic Bullet Looks in Premiere Pro CC.
'Paul' (short film 2019)
In: Cameras
Posted
Thanks LOM.
I wish I could have shown more about the characters, but I didn't have producers/help or extras to allow me to get scenes with more interaction/people.