Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Paulo

  1. Thanks for the kind comment, Emanuel. Unfortunately I guess there isn't an option for 120fps RAW capture right now. If you follow the app's page in Discord people might help you finding options for 4K 60fps. The S22 Ultra records 60fps, but only at 1440p. Um abraço!
  2. A short video I've made with the S22 Ultra:
  3. youtube.com/watch?v=Js4QrmtCJZ0 youtube.com/watch?v=OxEty-OLOoo
  4. Regarding the motorola, it's great for use with motioncam. All 3 back cameras plus the front facing one work with both 24, 25 and 30 fps. The telephoto also features OIS like the main. Its resolution at 16;9 tops out at 1832p, but the upscale to 2160p is good enough (the attached video shows it). Mics are also great (stereo). It makes for a good all-around pocket camera. Sone more telephoto samples (incuding low light). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxEty-OLOoo http://youtube.com/watch?v=Js4QrmtCJZ0
  5. Thanks, mate! I'm still testing different approaches for editing the RAW files in Resolve aiming at HDR delivery for youtube. I use Windows, so no HDR viewers in Resolve for me. I had to deal with it using a Viewer's LUT. Anyway, I think that at least for now I've managed to find a good setup for a natural looking image with minimal quality degradation in relation to the uploaded file. I've also managed to get rid of the colour shift I was facing before on the files coming out of Resolve. HDR is almost mandatory if you want the best quality on YT. The HDR bitrate is almost double the SD bitrate.
  6. Take a look at the app's page at Discord. Plenty of xiaomi users there, but I think 120pfs at 4K is not possible at the moment.
  7. I've tried to embed the last video with no success. How can I do it here?
  8. Recorded with a Motorola One Zoom https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=piiK1Xcc5Do&feature=youtu.be
  9. Here's one of my results with the RX10 II and Davinci Resolve 12 (Win64). ******************************* Source: 4K Slog2. Colour graded (with LUT) and exported to h264 1080p (15.000 kbps). ******************************* For the audio, I used a RODE Stereo Videomic Pro. It records LPCM automatically, which is quite interesting. The camera also seems to automatically adjust the audio level. I did some 4K exports before, but as it's mpeg4 (the free version won't allow me to export 4K in h264), the blacks are simply awful on YouTube and nothing like what I saw on Resolve's preview. Exporting to h264 yields correct blacks, so I decided to stick with 1080p. It's a shame, because watching the files (even the YouTube downloaded versions) back on MPC-HC, the picture seems quite good to my taste. ******************************* Exposure settings: 25 fps - 1/50s - ISO 3200 (+2.0 E.V. showing on the viewfinder). I found that the MPC-HC is the best player to play these files back (compared to what's seen on Resolve's preview window). P.S.: YouTube degrades the IQ quite a bit.
  10. This app is actually a FRAUD. The so called 'increased dynamic range' is an absurd statement. I've noticed that you gain absolutely no additional information changing from normal to flat in low light. I then noticed that it would not happen with highlights. That got me curious. What we can easily investigate is that this 'flat profile' option is just a mere filter, like the one people use to apply over jpeg's to post on Instagram. What it ACTUALLY DOES is change the Exposure values (either shutter speed or ISO) in order to recover highlights and then apply some 'greyish' filter to give it a cinematic look. It happens in all situations. In low light is more visible, because it cannot go slower than the selected frame rate. It is NOTHING like profile pictures such as Cinelike-D or S-log like the developer claims. Try it yourselves. Turning the Flat Profile option alters the exposure parameters quite dramatically. Take a look at this two frames and their crops. I repeat. This is a FRAUD. Glad I didn't buy the full version.
  • Create New...