Jump to content

Eduardo Granadsztejn

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eduardo Granadsztejn

  1. The "mojo" of any Blackmagic (including the pocket) is unique. 

    The film texture unmatchable, there is no Sony, Panasonic or even Canon at that price point.

    We must wait until see the real footage of this one, and the posible problems of hardware (hope none)

    And wait until the A7s mark 3 specs (2,5 times the cost of this)

    What do you think about the BMPCC4K against the A7III? ($ 700 more)

     

    Regards!

  2. Hi guys!

    I was thinking with all this madness with the bmppc 4k about the prores proxy of it (or every other Blackmagic camera)

    Is it really usable?

    how bad or good is it against the h264 from Canon and Sony? (and against the XAVC-S)

    How much weigth per minute?

     

    Thanks!!

     

    Regards from Uruguay!

  3. 23 minutes ago, Cinegain said:

    Just... people have been begging for high-res and keep hammering down footage has to be sharp and detailed.

    Yet... they end up loving soft smeary Canons.

    I takes getting used to. Also, you need to know your camera and grading, you can't just buy an exceptional camera and expect yourself to become exceptional by ownership of said camera and get stunning results. It's all in the lensing, lighting, motion and what's in front of the camera. You use it as a point-n-shoot camera? You'll get point-n-shoot results. The quality of results is enhanced by the quality it shoots in. Miss an inch of focus on a GH5 and it's cringe, because it's so noticeable. Do the same with a Canon and you can hardly tell, because it hardly resolves with the same kind of precision. Don't know if a lot of footage out there is from people new to the system, being done with either Canon or Sony, or upgraders from previous iterations of Lumix G cameras. The former group probably still struggles, the latter should in meanwhile know how to make it work by now.

    Noticed Albert got himself one! Now that will be an exciting channel to check back to if you like nice looking footage!

     

    I never said that are bad cameras, it is like Iphone and Samsung cameras, 
    The samsung cameras ( S6, s7, s8) are better in many things over than the iphone´s, but to me there are over sharper and over saturated (to my taste)

    I like the iphone`s camera "mojo" (even softer) more than the Galaxy´s.

    It about taste and what you like.

    Just saying that, i know perfectly what are capable the ghx´s 

    I will buy a new camera soon (now i have a t2i) and i saw a lot of videos from all cameras below 3.000 usd 

     

  4. 5 hours ago, Fritz Pierre said:

    So I take it you don't feel this piece shot on the GH5 has the "mojo" you need in a camera?...perhaps you can tell us what camera you shoot on that works for you?

     

    Only few can make this with a GHx from what I've seen (and knowing a lot of color grading) , there are other cameras that can reach easily for me ( i don`t know much color grading) the "mojo" that i want like Blackmagic, canon and even sony. That´s my point.

    Why people always complain about the video ish look of the GHx?

  5. 14 hours ago, Fritz Pierre said:

    You should  see the Academy Award winning film Hurt Locker lol....shot on "robotic s16 mm" won Best Director for Kathryn Bigelow...in 2008!!!...some of the posts on this forum can be hilarious!...I would recommend you see the film though...It will make you want to own a 16mm sized sensor on a Digital Bolex...by comparison m4/3 is enormous!

    It is not about the mount (BMPCC is very cinematic), I think it is about the GHx ¨mojo"

  6. HI!

    This year i´m going to buy a new camera (upgrade from my beloved t2i) i was waiting to the full specs of the gh5 and it´s a beast, but i expected a better dynamic range in the new sensor.

    the other option that i´m thinking is the new Sony a6500 which has better dynamic range, a fullframe look with a speedbooster for less money and better low light. 

    In one side I have the gh5 which has a lot of better things than the 6500 in terms of usability, video options and all in one package, and for other side the 6500 with various flaws to work with (buy a cage, extra bateries, some overheating, etc) but with a better image to me.

     What do you guys think than i must priorize?
    The final image or an easy way to work (the gh5 video quiality seems to be outstanding but the 6500 has better dynamic range and i think this is very important)

    Thank you!
     

     

  7. Hello,

    I need to buy a camera to record a cook while cooking, it is for distance learning courses.
    I need good battery life, sound recording direct in camera and good auto focus. I do not need more than 1080p

    Which of this two you guys recommend?

    Thank you!

  8. 1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said:

    So first proper shoot with the A6300 this weekend.

    I had terrible overheating problems after an hour, not even recording continuously but rather 2-5 mins at a time with brief pauses in-between.

    Also the manual focus assist zoom is a joke... how the heck do Sony think this is even usable to check focus in video mode... How do you tell if a shot is sharp by looking a blurry mess!!? Basic logic fail.

    However the 4K image is just... SO GOOD.

    Nice form factor and EVF too. Also the quality of the rear screen (when not zoomed) - very very good indeed.

    The overheating is in 4k or 1080? is there a difference?

     

    Thanks!

  9. 5 minutes ago, bzpop said:

     

    don't make your choice between today (a6300) and yesterday (GH4), at least wait till GH5 comes out

    You know what´s the problem?

    If rumors are true the gh5 will be announced next september, and I will travel to NY next July (I´m from Uruguay, and that is my chence to getting a camera at right price)

    I will wait until NAB 2016 but every rumor point the gh5 to photokina :P

×
×
  • Create New...