Jump to content

shijan

Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

Everything posted by shijan

  1. Shijan, could you please tell me in which of the videos specifically you see overexposure/too little detail in the highlights or low dynamic range? [/quote] Hello! For example here on the stones or test chart highlights [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGxkEHuxgRE#ws]sinaCAM ungraded video 1080p[/url] [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fg3MpAYu4_k#ws]actionconcept sinaCAM Chart Test[/url] even in extended range mode trees looks almost black and dull sky with clouds time after time blows highlights a little. But i really don't know is it fault of processing, or kodak sensors or ccd sensors at all which can't smooth highlights in correct way, or is it some magic low level sensor turning settings which can be done in secret test laboratolies. For example Si-2k camera or common DSLRs also have this problem but all those white holes in the sky looks softer, maybe its cmos sensor nature maybe not. Compare it all to Alexa or Scarlett or even NEX 7 and the difference become more than visible. [url=http://vimeo.com/28786762]BLOODROP (HD 2D)[/url] From other side all those look is unique in its own way, and like it or hate it people must decide independently.
  2. [quote author=cameraboy link=topic=402.msg2563#msg2563 date=1331818073] what is wrong with this image... nice analog look... [url=https://vimeo.com/30039857]https://vimeo.com/30039857[/url] [/quote] wrong is that all white things there looks like self illuminated materials. and its all because sensor low dynamic range. also the trick is that analog film handle highlights in very cool and smooth way but can't see many details in the shadows, and the digital sensors (especially ccd ones) can see many details in the shadows but usually blows highlights in very roughly way. BTW you can see same problem with SinaCam footage which also use those Kodak CCD sensor [url=http://www.sinacam.eu/media/]http://www.sinacam.eu/media/[/url]
  3. [quote author=cameraboy link=topic=402.msg2557#msg2557 date=1331811887] that kodak sensor is very good ... its big brother of a cam dll sensor ... i dont know how they get such a ugly image from great sensor ... [/quote] thats why i believe that a cam dll is not good camera too) its footage has same strange look too
  4. Looks like its one of Allied machine vision cameras inside :) alliedvisiontec.com/emea/products/cameras.html BTW The footage is terrible as for me. Low dynamic range, digitally burned highlights, magenta tint everywhere in highlights. And Its all that old Kodak CCD sensor fault. I really can't understand why all those new 2/3 cameras builders are decided to use use those crappy industrial Kodak ccds when there are tons of great small modern sensors on this planet...
×
×
  • Create New...