esti

I agree, what is the point in compensating with frame rates and timelines, for somerthing that should just work. I will do some tests without IBIS on and post. I'm basing my hunch on the lens stabilisation on my canon 5D zoom lens, i remember shooting on a tripod doing pans, and it looked so jittery (much worse than this issue) but when stabilisation was turned off, it solved the problem. It would make sense if it is fighting the pan. The question is, is is this something that happens in the a7 series?

I also have this problem and am searching for a solution. I just made a project that used super slow pans, and I am getting this jittery effect despite the pans being very slow. I'm shooting, wide open at 25fps, and 1/50. I am beginning to think it is the IBIS that is the cause. It makes no sense to not see blurry pans, but instead see a succession frames with no blur, which is what it looks like. Is the IBIS fighting the panning motion? I used the a6500 with IBIS on and with a crane initially and the result was awful. The corners of the footage was vibrating vert slightly, and noticeable when the gimbal was held still for still handheld shots. When not using the crane, with IBIS on, it also has this jittery pan effect, but not the vibrating corners (which I gather is the IBIS fighting the crane stabilisation). The question is, does it happen with IBIS off? In which case, what is the point of IBIS for video? This is why I bought this camera.