Snowbro

Well, in general, "produce" is creating something. Science tells us that matter cannot be completely destroyed. The only way that we know of to completely destroy something, is through deadweight loss. Aka liberal politicians that do not understand basic economics, yet are the ones making the decisions that directly impact it.

I am just wondering if there are people out there that think 6K will ever be an adopted format. I can't see 6K deliverables being requested.

I agree. There are great diminishing returns regarding my 4k monitor vs 1440p, but my 65" 4K OLED can use a few more pixels IMO. Then again, that is all relative as well.

You obviously haven't seen what they have done with the A7RIV lol. Back to square one

From a consumer standpoint, 6K is never going to become mainstream in any real way. It is just useful for getting better 4K footage. Anyone else think in a few years 8K will be like 4K was (marketing wise) in 2015?

It will likely be $7000 and a big old heavy brick. If it has true cinema capabilities, I would say the weight, size and price would be worth it. It is however primarily a pro sports camera, not a C.

I have had the best luck shooting at a higher frame rate, then slowing it down to 24p and stabilizing. No blurring problems then. Usually no low light issues after 60p recording in 4K and export to about 2.5k in a 4k frame upscale to fit.

Being a software guy and seeing what Google has done over the years with pixel. I guarantee you in the somewhat near future, you will see many top cameras only use digital stabilization. It will rock when you have low rolling shutter and use a 6k sensor and output a final image at 4k, or 8k/6k etc. The cameras could get even smaller & lighter with less power consumption. That being said, I dont think canons current digital IS on anything I have seen from them could replace a gimbal. Maybe in 10 years; I would put my money on Panasonic or Fuji. Forgot to mention: ibis/lens stabilization always has an odd floaty type feel or unnatural jerky motion to it. I havent seen that oddness when I have just shot handheld on a low rolling shutter camera and stabilized it in post, or just good implementation of digital IS. Low light seems to be the last thing they are figuring out for it, but I would bet that will be resolved quickly.

Why would they share it now that Sony has done exactly what I said they would, recycle.

This could be interesting, apparently it has been leaked around and people have got their hands on them. I sold most of my DSLR lenses and don't see myself buying more this late in the game. Anyone else probably pass on this even though it likely will put out an amazing picture? There is about a 2% chance they put CLOG in it haha. "It’s likely the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III will shoot 6K video without a crop. Dual CFExpress cards are in the prototype models and will likely make it to the production version. There will be a “significant jump in resolution for an EOS-1 series camera”. The EOS-1D X was 18.1mp and the EOS-1D X Mark II came in at 20.2mp. So I guess anything over a 2mp bump could be considered “significant” to some. New DIGIC processor. Canon doesn’t usually introduce a new DIGIC processor in the EOS-1D series, but that will apparently change this time. IBIS is in prototype cameras"

New eye AF looks good. It was pretty trash before

Here is how in 7 easy steps https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/naturally-selected/201702/7-steps-becoming-dictator

I don't trust new photoshop avatar andrew. I think it is an imposter #conspiracy

@sonyfanboys This is hilarious

I'm glad that I am down to just two canon things now, a 16-35 lens and an intervalometer. Maybe one day I will be able to sell them.

They release their new tech every 4 years. 2020 they will show us what they have been working on, I doubt they will ever go to 2 year cycles like Sony has. It was funny to watch the 1DX II still hold relevance for so long, but it stops being so funny in the last year of its life cycle.

Nah, not Sony hating today Odin. I just was testing an A7iii and looking at picture profile settings. I kept seeing "Youtubers" crying about spending a small amount on the EOS HD profile. In a court of law, my 'Intent' for this thread, would be laughing at youtubers, not Sony. I already said I thought the HLG from the A7iii looked good, I just need to figure out a processing I like with it. It seems to convert it oddly in Premiere Pro, the color completely changes compared to any media player I view it in. I read that it converts it automatically to 709 in premiere? That is annoying.

So are your clickbait youtube video titles; why are you such a hater adam?

I don't think the reviewer would have been able to on his own, without already seeing Andrews settings IMO. I was just laughing at how cheap people are.

I made the mistake of trying the 4k 24p in cine4 without adjusting the sharpness, it looked pretty bad. I then tried HLG 2 with detail at -6, I thought it looked pretty good. I noticed that that IBIS is really only good for standing still, even at 35mm wide. I wonder when Sony is going to catch up to Panasonic/Olympus in that regards. Canon now has a DUAL IS patent, but I bet they will still cripple the video in their next camera. Is the object tracking only in the A9/A6400? I thought I read it was coming to the A7iii as well?

Did you press play on the video? He is one of many I have seen complaining about EOS HD color profiles. I just found it funny tbh; they spend thousands on the camera stuff, then cry about spending $19.

I thought Andrew's looked the best; I have been messing with an A7iii out of boredom. I think I will use the XT3 for video though, it has the best small camera IQ I have used.

Switch to Kodak

My Furby almost killed me as a kid. The Chinese spying equipment inside it exploded, now I look like Harvey Dent.

I enjoyed him saying how he was a dentist and did not need to scam people for a grand here and there. Seemed legit because I have family who gross over a million per year as dentists, then I see that he probably made around 2-3 grand/year. I swear more people on the internet are trying to scam you, than people looking to do commerce. I just listed a $5,000 bike on some classifieds, had a few different people want to verify serial number since there are fake frames from china. Next thing I know I have police at my door and the accusers used the serial number, claiming it was their stolen bike. The best way to sell something, is still meeting in person with a concealed carry. People are lazy though.