Jump to content

Garreth Caulfield

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Garreth Caulfield reacted to agolex in Is it just me or is the A7sii Stills pretty sweet?   
    Didn't get the focus and framing identical, but here goes. :p It's just that with the R I often notice the better resolution, especially at night with long exposures. But it's hard to really pick what's better, there's always the variance of settings/framing and shit involved, as well. In the examples I just shot I found the colors of the S better, it picked the White Balance differently, as well (readjusted that for the R in Lightroom). All in all, I don't know, I'd rather not spend too much time with stuff like this, because there's so much variables involved and I like both cameras. For stills I usually go with the R, just because of the better AF and the plus in resolution and for video I prefer the S for full frame 4K and for lower light scenarios, because it's always so clean.
    Image 1 + 2 f8 (both 1600 ISO, 1/160, standard, no PP, matched WB), first a7sii, second a7rii.
    Image 3 + 4 f1.8 (both 1/160, standard, no PP, matched WB), first a7sii 125 ISO, second a7rii 100 ISO. Lens: Zeiss 55 1.8, S uncompressed raw, R compressed raw (should have matched that but forgot). Edit: Tried both uncompressed and compressed and there's no visible difference.
     




  2. Like
    Garreth Caulfield reacted to Mattias Burling in Is it just me or is the A7sii Stills pretty sweet?   
    Like most Ive read about 1000 comments saying "a7rii if you also want to shoot stills and a7sii for video only".
    Since I mostly use medium format film for stills I couldn't care less, but ultimately went for the S because I wanted minimum moire.
    But I do use Instagram and take some photos around the family and for that I could use any camera really. So I have taken a few with the a7sii.  
    And I must say... wow.
    I think they look stellar. I cant really put my finger on it exactly but they have an "organic feel" (lack of better word) that's very pleasing imo.

    My theory is that its the low 15mega pixels on a large sensor. I guess it takes away the "digital" sharpness in the same way as the HD vs 4K thing. And also how a full sensor read often is more pleasing than a binned down sample. I see the same in the NX500 4k crop vs the NX1 6K down sample.
    Here is an example compared to the D750 which has a very high megapixel. Bot are nice but I think the less sharp a7sii is nicer.
    A7sii

    D750

    The pic above as well as the once bellow are almost straight from the camera. Standard jpegs. I might have added a vignette or so but no "Insta filters".
    Im not claiming to be a good photographer or anything, but what I like is how there is tons of detail without the "digital sharpness".



    On this I added some sharpening.

    So anyone else seen the same thing?
    Anyone have any stills to share?
    (Could be my mind playing a trick on me to justify the quite hefty price on the a7sii, even though I got a 10% discount )
     
    At the end of the day I think it will serve me well for most pics and when I need something "richer" I use good old Kodak

     
     
×
×
  • Create New...