Jump to content

agachart

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by agachart

  1. On 28/2/2561 at 1:04 AM, Emanuel said:

    To you and everyone who cares about the minimum requirements I believe:

    image.png.5525c95791d317730b216720237f7c59.png

     

    I've never noticed that with Panasonic or am I only a happy camper from unrelated shooting style?

    panasonic anti on-sensor PDAF that you win LOL.

    i think panasonic careful about new AF(on new GH) may they use 2 sensor in camera 1peice is image sensor others is PD sensor same as old DSLR.

    * (secret source)
     

  2. 1 hour ago, Damphousse said:

     

    Damn!  That warranty though...

    https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2018/2/20/17031256/worlds-largest-ssd-drive-samsung-30-terabyte-pm1643

     

    Get comfortable with 8k kids.  It's coming!  Every excuse that comes up keeps getting eliminated.

    don't worry guy,on 8K ages we will see SSD(or advance flash mem) inside around 120GB.

    it had much transfer from image sensor to memory (2000GB or above) ,i will show diagram.

    -> read from SS -> store to SSD -> process raw / HEVC(processor encoding) -->

    -> write to ultra fast sd-card(8/10 bit or raw) -->delete from store(because SSD capacities limit) --> repeat read from SS

     

    Why SSD? althought camera-buffer faster than ssd but it has low capacities.

    Why read SS to store? because we need full bitrate possible, -> read from SS ->> to buffer and incamera-process ->> store to UHS = low color profile.

    -> read from SS -> store to SSD -> process raw / HEVC(processor encoding) --> = high color profile (8/10/12 bit or you need raw)

     

    How? add in-camera IO management like CPU + chipset.

     

    sorry my comment hard to read,

    :confounded:

     

    i think memory & I/O controller in camera look bad when compare to PC/SmartPhone.

    i want camera manufacturer develop new chip.

  3. 5 hours ago, wolf33d said:

    Yep. As you point the AF is the problem on the pana. For this reason I will get the A7S3, which will be close in spec with GH5 but with:

    way better low light 

    way better AF (I expect A6500 level) 

    swallow DoF when needed 

    better DR

     

    where is testing of GH5's AF?
    why you tell it's slow!!!

  4. On 11/1/2560 at 11:23 PM, wolf33d said:

    http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/red-just-dethroned-sony-a7rii-dxomark/

    The new APSC 35mpx Red sensor beats everything in the world of stills camera. Higher dynamic range than D810 (15.2 stops!!!!) and incredible tonal range and high ISO

    I do not understand how an APSC sensor like this can get that much DR and high ISO capability VS lets say a D810 sensor. Are RED sensor that much more advanced? Why dont we have APSC sensors with 15.2 of DR in stills camera? Or at leas in FF sensors. I dont get it.

    If RED can do this why not Canon Sony Nikon or anyone else. 

    I want a 35mpx FF sensor with those performance in DR and high ISO in a Canon mirrorless body compatible with Canon lenses with IBIS, 4K60p, FHD240p, Canon DPAF,  H265 150mbps codec + prores option, 10 bit. for 3000$. 

    This will come in about 3 years. But damn... It exists today so why not :(

    it is simply decide,this sensor made with new tech design,material and anything that we don't know.

    why s35 beat FF/MF sensor?
     

    advance-cmos beat garbage cmos,i do not surprise.

    where you come from ? your country do not know the science!!! 

  5. 4 hours ago, jonpais said:

    I will say again, at the risk of repeating myself a million times: I have also owned five Panasonic cameras; they are supremely video-centric, and even the lowly G7 is capable of being used in productions: Panasonic could have released these upgrades incrementally over a period of years; that they packed so much into a camera at this price point is nothing short of miraculous: but codecs and bits aside, the color science of the GH5 is still unmistakably Panasonic. And since I can still dream, my ideal camera would be a GH5 with something like the X Trans sensor.

    you 're right panny modified new cfa from 2*2 to 6*6 that color may like x-trans sensor!!!

  6. On 19/9/2559 at 5:24 AM, wolf33d said:

    Please tell them to give us IBIS in the GH5 too and more than all a decent AF in video (DPAF) like the new Olympus EM1. Does. 

    Those two features added to what they announced today will make it the best camera on the market for low budget video. 

    I will buy it instantly but not without those two features. Canon, Sony, Olympus all have good AF in video now. 

     

    Em1 mark2 had cross type(PDAF) for what?

    You knew all M4/3 lens had Contrast Base mechanism,they will move multiple direction +/-,left/right,in/out for most contrast on subject.

    but pd mechanic lens has certain direction,and distance they move once(or least) for focus on subject.

    and you want Lumix Phase Dectect,Which lumix lens had direction controller(single chip)?

    I do not Know,Now.

  7. On 2/4/2016 at 8:38 AM, Márcio Kabke Pinheiro said:

    Don't expect a S35 or exotic sensors in the GH5 - probably will be the 20mp sensor from the GX8 and Olympus Pen F. They are with the hands tied by Sony - Panasonic was not developing sensors from a long time, just recently they started again (read it somewhere). The organic sensors are still in the future too, I guess. PDAF is probably out, too - looks like that Panasonic bets all in the DFD technology.

    The only way to improve the low light perfomance with the current tech is to go the BSI way; but Sony is holding the technology for their cameras - their clients are not receiving BSI sensors, only the Sony cameras. Samsung is the only other sensor manufacturer that makes a large BSI sensor (in the NX1), but looks like that they are out of the game (a GH5 with a Samsung BSI sensor would be great).

    The A6300 might be a low light monster - if the BSI tech in its sensor is the same from the A7RII, the pixel pitch of the sensor will be even greater than the A7RII.

    Personality,i think panasonic intent develop new Auto Focus tech for new GH.

    Because DFD on video can't compare to Dual pixel,NX1 continue-af and Sony 4D AF.

     

  8. These R&D announcements usually don't map particularly well to reality.  Often they are more PR than R&D.  What Panasonic needs and needs badly in the GH5 is something to compete with the stuff coming from Sony and Blackmagic.   They need high quality 96 FPS 4k with global shutter around 30-60 FPS and less photo sites to improve low light. I don't have an opinion one way or another on micro 4/3.  If they made it a Super35 sensor that would be great.  Micro 4/3 would be just fine as I have Speedboosters.

     

     

    There are no real global shutter now but artificial GS can make it low or less rolling effect.

    such as Multi-Voltage readout for each frame?

  9. You mention that the Metabones Speed Booster XL 0.64x isn't compatible with the GH2. Since I have a couple of old cameras around that might be useful as backup, I wrote a mail to Metabones and asked about that. The answer I received was this:

    "Dear Jorgen,

    Good morning!

    Both the Panasonic GH1 & GH2 are compatible with the Speed Booster XlL 0.64x.

    Regards
    Elsie
    GBI Ltd"

    ​yeah,and i hope panasonic brink back wide aspect sensor like GH2.

    this GH4 had little time for develop ,panasonic make 2.3 crop on standard m4/3 's 16mp that made bad crop factor.

  10. ​Well Digital Bolex with tiny sensor does look great. It proves that a film like dynamic range (13+ stops), global shutter, etc. can be done with a smaller chip.

    But they need to give us the choice.

    Would Canon and Nikon be anywhere near as successful if they had never launched their digital full frame ranges and stuck to crop formats?

    It doesn't help that Micro Four Thirds is a non-standard as far as cinematography goes, either. It's not Super 16mm so out go most of those lenses (vignetting) and it's not Super 35mm so you miss out on the corners of your Cookes, etc. It's a very creative camera for adapting these lenses, yes... but not optimal.

    2.3x crop is not my favourite look from my full frame lenses.

    There's always Speed Booster but if Panasonic did S35 we could use that for full frame... important thing is we'd have the choice.

    ​thanks Andrew,for this topic,

    but i total disagree that the GH5 needs to be Super 35,they had varicam 35 now,if user want s35 format may panasonic build machine with Varicam 35 image sensor.

    i think GH4 was incomplete machine with 2.3 crop factor(readout 8.3mp on total 16mp that look ugly),if new m4/3 machine released as least 1.86 crop factor like GH2

    i bet it'll be favorite hybrid camera again.

     

  11. new thing always had more interest :)

    i disagree with GH5  it has to be Super 35mm!!!,no time to new formate to panasonic/olympus(panny had vericam35 if you want super35 sensor)

    i will wait GX8 and GH5 that may had new mega pixel sensor.

    assume it had 22mp and 5k downscale to 4k . 5120 x 3840 for m4/3 still photo and 5120 x 2880 on 5K readout ,panasonic need extreme fast readout.

    i think they can do fast pixel.

×
×
  • Create New...