Brett Munoz

regardless, still looks as detailed as a scaled down 4k image.

Funny, I spoke to a Canon rep and he stated that the C100MKII does NOT scale down which I found weird since I too read somewhere it does.

I shoot lots of weddings and also music videos/shorts. I really like the Canon C100MKII look but hate the lack of 4k and 120fps. The c300mkii is awesome but out of my budget. I really like the FS5 but do notice it has a "slightly" more videoish look when compared to the c100mkii (I think cause it is so sharp). Also, I might have a hard time matching colors with my 5diii and gh4. Any feedback is greatly appreciated!

Lmao. What a POS! Will sell 10 cameras.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think it matters and most people won't be able to tell the difference. Content is king! However, on a budgeted professional shoot, I have only seen Reds or Alexas on raw or prores but I am sure there are the exceptions. As for reality TV, I've seen it all. A buddy of mine works on Daly show and is being shot on the 5d Mark III at H.264.

I don't mean to offend but maybe it's good enough for grading video of your kids in the backyard but for professional environments where you know you will be color grading you will roll with 10bits if not raw because its not worth the risk. I rather bake in 8bits if I know I will only be making small adjustments.

How does color in the new a7s ii compare to Canon?

Log on compressed 8bit video files? Did I miss something? Wouldn't grading such files cause banding and other such horrifics on files from the Gh4?

Does anyone know of any metabones alternatives? The speed booster is too pricey for me. I don't need control of the aperture. I currently have the lens turbo however, it seems to suffer from a blue dot in the center.