Jump to content

tylerh

Members
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. ‚ÄčThe reason i was looking at EF is because EF metabolise speed booster gives you image stabilisation as long as the EF lens has it. I did see the ART lenses by Sigma and heard very good things about them. Is the Sigma art aimed at videographers ? Seriously considering the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 lens. It seems like it would blow the Panasonic 12-35 f2.8 away. Anyone tried this lens on a GH4?
  2. There seems to be a lot of options. I was hoping for a simple MFT Voigtlanders are better or EF glass is better.... never that easy is it lol :-) Those lenses are available in MFT format, but the 0.95 voigtlanders seem to have better reviews than the Samyang t1.5s. Then again they are more expensive.
  3. I was wondering if anyone could give me some advice. I just got a GH4 for mainly video use, now i don't own ANY glass at all. So the two options I'm looking at is either getting the Metabones Speed Booster along with the Samyang 10 mm F2.8, Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS Lens and Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8, which would cost a total of $2,896 .... OR i could go with MFT lenses, the Voigtlander 10.5 f/0.95, Voigtlander Nokton 25mm f/0.95 and the Voigtlander Nokton 42.5mm f/0.95. Assuming the 10.5 Voigtlander will cost at least $999, that would make the MFT lenses come to $2,998. That is $102 more than the
×
×
  • Create New...