Jump to content

Futtpluby

Members
  • Posts

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Futtpluby reacted to Andrew Reid in Could Nikon be about to enter digital cinema market?   

    Today sees the announcement of a new DSLR sensor from one of Nikon's recent sensor supplier's Aptina which has a headline spec of 4K video at up to 80fps.

    The highly rated company says it is 'combining DSLR image quality and 4K digital cinema' with the new AR1411HS sensor. Along with Nikon being on the record for wanting to add 4K video to future Nikon 1 mirrorless cameras, could the new Super 16mm sized Aptina sensor pave the way for them to do a Cinema EOS style range and 4K on DSLRs?

    [url=http://www.eoshd.com/content/10158/could-nikon-be-about-to-enter-digital-cinema-market]Read the full article here[/url]
  2. Like
    Futtpluby reacted to Dr. John R. Brinkley in GH3 and Image Stabilization   
    From what I understand the only image stabilization with the GH3 is through the lenses, specifically lenses made by Panasonic. 
     
    Assuming this is true, I'm curious how people have fared with the GH3 when using legacy glass and/or non Panasonic lenses in regards to image stabilization.
     
     
     
    Just curious what people thought was wise/reasonable in how to maximize a stable image when shooting with the GH3. Obviously a tripod helps but was looking to see if anyone had thoughts on this issue.
     
     
     
  3. Like
    Futtpluby reacted to FilmMan in Red Dragon Picture   
    Check the link to see the Dragon Picture.  6K still. 
    http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?94476-Double-Dragon
  4. Like
    Futtpluby reacted to /p/ in IS Vs Monopod   
    I'm trying to decide whether it's worth buying the new Canon IS primes for video use, specifically the 35mm f/2 IS.. However it's almost $1,000 and for that price I could get the regular 35mm f/2 and a really decent video Monopod..
     
    Miller makes one that's about $150 (on sale right now for $128) for the monopod itself and $160 for the quick release plate. Sachtler also make one but it is quite a lot more expensive at $692 monopod+quick release plate.. 
     
    It's really just for when I can't use a tripod.. I really like the idea of being able to get steady hand held shots, but a monopod isn't really that much extra weight anyway.. I think the pro of the IS is that you aren't really restricted in any way but with the monopod you can also rest the weight of the camera on it inbetween shooting. Also with the monopod it will also give lenses without IS that stabilization too.
     
    Thoughts? Also, if anyone has experience with the Miller or Sachtler monpods I'd be really interested to hear what you think about them. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...