[quote name='Bioskop.Inc' timestamp='1353184331' post='21865']
I thought one of the benefits of using an anamorphic lens was that it makes the focal length wider - hence widescreen.
So why the obsession of wanting a 12mm or 24mm anamorphic lens - how wide do you really want or need to go?
I know most of you have gone the MFT route, but there are more & bigger sensors out there too!
So what happens when you drop 1K on a lens that you'll only ever be able to use on a MFT & you buy/rent a camera with a bigger sensor? Cause lets face it, things will move on & so will you - the glass you buy should be adaptable for the future.
Furthermore, the only cameras that have been used in films so far are the 5D & 7D, not the GH2.
If SLR Magic were sensible they wouldn't sell an anamorphic just for one camera/sensor size - so i've changed my mind, they need to make an anamorphic lens that is adaptable to different primes (re. Andrews recent question), but is that possible to do & make it a single focus system?
[/quote]
I really don't agree with that. I owned a 5D and switched to a GH1 with no remorse ! better image, codec, antialiasing, less rolling shutter, etc.. But apart from that, the Black Magic camera's sensor is almost Micro4/3's sized, the Digital Bolex also. I don't know about Red's or Alexa's because they're out of my league, but the full size sensor from the 5D isn't the futur to me ! Canon need to work hard to get close to this, even with the D300 which isn't as good as the BMC looks to be !
So if they work with micro4/3 sensor size in mind I don't think they're closing any doors for the futur.
That being said I do agree about how wide we need to go. I recently shot a short film and I only used an old 28mmF2.8 and a 50mmF1.7 from pentax with the ALGA7200 and honestly, it was wide enough. And again I think a 2,66 ratio (1.5X factor on a 16/9 sensor) could also reinforce this... Just my two cents ;)