magjipro

A lot of things are wrong with this post and review. I personally found the MK2 too sharp in HD video in many cases. And from what I've seen so far from the 3 its equal if not better. Also I've always been skeptical with shooting with non Canon L glass, as a photographer shooting and full resolution you see the weakness in lesser glass. Also shooting wide open is never the sharpest for any lens. Which seem what some impressions were based on. Its uneducated to judge the sharpness of the video if not shooting at the right Fstop and right lens. Also shooting wide open all the time is never smart for many reasons. So much people are so into getting a 2.8 or wider lens or trying to shoot that wide open but fail to understand that its not always the best way or smartest thing to do. On a wide lens you should almost never shoot under 5.6 unless you are hurting for light. Who whats a wide shot that is usually perceived as naturally sharper to look soft in a lot of areas because of DOF? I've also seen other postings else where which contradict some of the opinions here. As pixel peeping most of the times is just ignorant. Its about getting a tool that can get the job done and making it work. You audience is not gonna know the difference of care much, as long as it looks overall good and you accomplish illustrating your message. Pixel peepers never come off as smart as they perceive themselves to be. My apologies if this seems like an attack on the reviewer. My intention is only to let people know that before they put themselves out there and report on something they should think about how they approach it more and do a better job in fairly reporting on something and not make claims about and item that might not be truly accurate based on many other tangible factors.