[quote author=jcs link=topic=501.msg3302#msg3302 date=1333235769]
[quote author=brice link=topic=501.msg3301#msg3301 date=1333234858]Wait, what? Much better? Sorry, but this looks horrible.[/quote]
That's cool. All of this is art. I like it (I oversharpened it to make a point: could have been matched to the other image for a more pleasing film look). What part(s) don't you like? The lighting and color between the images was different from the start. I processed it to show high frequencies present in the WITH OLPF dataset (image frame).
It's not clear yet if removing the OLPF will result in any more information being stored after processing and compression. A resolution chart would show with reasonable certainty if resolution has been improved past ~890 lines (measured from multiple sources with resolution charts).
[/quote]
Sorry for being harsh, just not my cup of tea. But I am wondering what all was done to the screenshot? Given that the text was embedded in the file you worked with, I am wondering why the text looks like it has a slight Gaussian Blur applied?