Marc T

Thanks again for your feedback! I have three TS lenses, it is main reason I am looking for the best way to use them for architectural video. I do not expect to shift the lens while recording, but to record static shots (with the lens shifted) while something happens in the scene or very slow slide movements. Reading your comments, I am convinced that I have to give ML a try, furthermore with the new guide published here at Eoshd. But I still have the doubt about the GH5 and Metabones. How can I achieve the 1.28x crop from my TS FF lenses in the GH5? The 17TS should became a 22mm and the 24TS a 31mm, not so bad. But someone pointed out that sharpness would fall sooo much. Please, do you have any example of this effect? I would like to evaluate it from the point of view of video, which is far less demanding than a fine art print.

Hello, many thanks to everyone. I thought I was going to receive the reply notifications in my mail inbox and was waiting for them. But today I've seen your answers when I came back to the forum. Sorry for the delay! Nikkor, Hyalinejim, HockeyFan12, Maxotics and IronFilm... your recomendation of ML is something to consider, but I am scared about developing times. My clients are architects, builders and business owners whom I am trying to persuade to spend some money in video marketing about their works or spaces. It is going to be really low cost, but I hope to compensate it with my architect viewpoint and photography background. I can't make my current workflow any longer if I want it to stay profitable. Nowadays I feel comfortable whith the footage the XC10 gives me and the time it takes from there to the finished video. Maybe (or most likely) I am missing something to properly consider ML workflow equivalent to the workflow I am doing now... ? On the other hand, ML is only 2K in 5D3 in FF, and 4K in 2.25x crop. So here it behaves like any other cropped sensor. I expect to use 4k to move and zoom around the footage because 2K is still my delivery format. Limiting factor there... Thank you, inspiring! Well, if I asume it... Do you know if it still happens with the new adaptors? In case you used older versions... wwoooww, really amazing! But, it leads me to the question: how to tell architecture in video? It looks like just images in movement whith depth of view and I thing I am going to use another language, less descriptive and more about use and storytelling. But always with an architectural and technical view. Which adaptor did you use? Very interesting point about the edges! I understant that if I just use adaptors and not speedboosters it isn't going to happen? If I got the GH5, which adaptor would you recommend as a good balance between crop and sharpness?

Hello, this is my first post here at EOSHD. I have been reading Andrew's post for many years and I can't think about a better place to find answers to my doubts. I am an architectural photographer (www.fragments.cat) and I am going to expand activity to video. I have been using the Canon XC10 for year to learn to shoot and be prepared for the next step. What I have: Canon TS lenses, 17, 24, and 45. Canon 24-105 and 70-200. 5dMkii. What I need: a video camera compatible with my FF lenses, with a good dynamic range, low moiré and pleasant look when making movements. I will mostly shoot steady or with a slider. I have read about GH5 and Metabones adapters, Sony's and Canon's solutions, but the most information I get the most confused I am. Please, could someone shine some light?