trafficn

I can appreciate the tenor of the article seeing as I benefited from insane depreciation when I got a Sony F35, but I just can't help to comment on a few things I noticed while reading: Is the bit about pan+scan and not needing a dolly part of the overall satire? If so that's... hilarious. The F35 will only output 1920x1080, not 2k. I absolutely prefer the CCD for various reasons but clearly more expensive CMOS chips with the right backend can produce strikingly accurate and pleasing colors as well. For 50Mbps, the internal MXFs out of the C300 are astonishingly competent and devoid of most artifacts that plague other higher bitrate systems- even those that shoot "RAW" (ahem... blackmagic....). I remember when I first got my C300- this was coming off shooting on a 7D for years- I was blown away. A 4K cmos churning out gorgeously crisp 1080 rgb images. Honestly too crisp, looking back. A few soft fx filters help when needed. How so? Log is log. The gammas may differ but what metrics or evaluations lead you to believe canon log is better than s-log? Smells of nonsense. Eh, perhaps economic democracy but we can also thank our audiences for continuing to not give a shit about pretty pictures. Let's all bow to CONTENT, the authoritarian king of the universe.