New member, first post, hello everybody! So I'm considering getting the nx500 (mainly for video) and I would like some input from current nx500 owners on how well the camera cope with shooting handheld video. I shoot mainly home movie, running and gunning, type videos, non professionally and 99% is handheld, so good stabilization and small camera size is essential. I am well invested in m43 and my current main camera is an oly ep5, which I’m hanging onto almost solely because of the incredible ibis. But what is great stabilization without the image quality? I also have a gx7 which I bought as a replacement for the ep5 and although I love the quality of the image the lackluster stabilization and general jerkiness while panning, have forced me back to the oly. This brings me back to my question regarding the nx500. From what I have seen on vimeo and youtube the nx500 is incredibly well-behaved especially considering it only has lens based stabilization. I was also considering the lx100 and I am still lusting for the fabulous lens and 4k in a small package, but it seems to be suffering from the same issues as the gx7, just look at this sample footage from Gordon Laing: https://vimeo.com/109129034. I haven’t been able to find any similarly bad examples from the nx500. It might be that the Samsung processing unit is simply more powerful, but it is remarkably well-behaved also in panning where everything is smooth and without any crushing of detail. It even seems to be handling walking reasonably well. Generally the nx500 just seems like an incredible deal especially now that I can get it of ebay, with a kit lens, for just over 500$ including sending and I would like to hear from current nx500 owners if my observations are correct, or I should just stick with what I have and wait for Olympus to catch up on the image side?