Jump to content

visigoth

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by visigoth

  1. I'd love to hear others weigh in here -- has anyone else compared footage from before and after the update?  (It remains a unique camera body in other respects; is the video now competitive?)

  2. Ah right.  That makes sense.  Something to be aware of, btw -- not sure whether you've ever covered it here? -- is that Metabones has just added PDAF support for the E-M1 in a firmware update.  This *should* make Canon EF lenses focus as well as Oly's own Four Thirds glass, when shooting stills.  It doesn't work with video, unfortunately:

    http://www.metabones.com/article/of/firmware_update_version_1.8

  3. Very useful review.  One question, however -- perhaps I'm being thick, but I can't untangle this bit:  "What Olympus have got resoundingly spot on especially with the E-M5 II is the stills side.  There’s a caveat though. The AF performance is extremely lens dependent, varying rather erratically.  Sadly on the E-M5 II it is just too inaccurate to be fully usable at the moment…  On the E-M1 and GH4 this doesn’t seem to be as much of an issue."

    It would seem that you're saying that they haven't got it spot on with the E-M5 II, but have with the E-M1.  Or am I missing something?

    (This would be useful for me to know, as I have an E-M1, but have not tried Canon lenses with it.  Should I?)  

×
×
  • Create New...