Steve Townsend

For me IS is important AF not. Can you confirm that IS works 100% with the Commlite. hmcindle says not or at least not always, and ade says yes but only when recording. When recording makes sense because it even needs a half press on the 5D to start the lens IS as with Nikon and others I'm sure. Just trying to establish if I should be getting the Metabones instead of the Commlite for reliable IS. I haven't jumped to the A7s yet but need to know this important stuff because I don't want to regret. I have a lot of kit (2x5D3 and 12xEF lenses)!! Secondly interesting toxtis70 thoughts on the E 18-105mm f4. I hadn't thought about that lens!! Always been my knee jerk to get the expensive 24-70mm based on the previous lenses I have owned in that range which are also very expensive, the 24-70f2.8 Canon and Nikon!! Appreciate your help.

jcs your fashion example about certainly shows off all very well and auto everything it is impressive. That is the A7s? Yes I have read the Commlite is good.

Yes I am interested in the same. I have a host of EF glass and Zeiss ZF converted to EF. I would keep your existing lenses and as Eleison correctly points out their zooms are a bit slow. That said maybe with both the A7s full frame and high iso you don't need such fast glass for shallow DOF and exposure in low light? Anyway I would get the 24-70FE f4 as a minimum but your existing I would keep.

Nice work, love your Cascada film

I think all this comment about the used price vs new and the mention of $12000 is unfair. Personally, I wouldn't dream of buying a used 1DC for £5000 when you can get a brand new one for £5828 plus vat. I can claim the VAT back and I'm sure many can who are possibly in the market for this camera. I'm thinking about it, especially with the heaps of EF lenses!!!