bnystedt

Hi Inazuma, Thanks for checking out my GH4 stuff and my GX7 review, too! If I had to rank the GH4 for general image quality, I'd place it slightly above the GH3 and GX7. IMHO, for most still photographers, the GX might be the better choice since it's smaller and if you're planning on using Olympus lenses, the IBIS is nice to have. If you're looking at upgrading to a GH4 for its rugged enclosure, I think it'll fit the bill quite nicely but at a premium. GH3s are only around $1K body-only and you get a very durable camera and almost the same IQ. The GH4 is a bit of a tough pill to swallow for $700 more if you're not planning on using it for its most impressive intended purpose—4K video capture. Thanks again! -b

Hi everybody, I'm Brendan and I write for Reviewed.com (formerly Camcorderinfo.com/Digitalcamerainfo.com). We put together a special piece investigating the GH4's video abilities. We ran our standard tests and you should really check out our rolling shutter visualization and the links to our full-resolution crops of our video sharpness chart. HD: '> 4K: '> And the link to our video performance review: http://camcorders.reviewed.com/content/panasonic-lumix-gh4-video-shooting-review For kicks, here's our normal full review: http://cameras.reviewed.com/content/panasonic-lumix-gh4-digital-camera-review We regularly shoot our videos with GH3s so we're intimately familiar with using the GH family. If there's anything else we can answer, please let me know! Thanks! -brendan