thementalist

Do what you want cause an idiot is free, you are an idiot! 

Goodbye sony.

Can the improvement justify this discussion and the 'how to'?

Thanks

Come on, you had to expect this next logical question, after the 4k to 1080p resample.

I know, 1080p is not four size of 720p. So let's start theory for poor 1080p-people like me who doesn't have money to get 4k.

Today, DSLR shoot in 1080p in 60 fps if we are lucky, but it's enough or could it be. To get better colours, can we use the trick to resample in 720p, in a certain way?

If it's a stupid question, sorry

+1 for windows version

It's not about gh4, it's how we say fuck to firmware limits on panasonic, canon, Nikon, etc

I can guarantee that the internal XAVC-S 1080p from the A7S will not look as good as getting 1080p from the 4K output and doing your scaling in post with all that processing power available on your desktop.

 

8bit 4K 4:2:0 = 10bit 1080p 4444 remember. If the maths have complications and gotchas, the image to my eyes does not. The GH4's 4K looks like 10bit when you grade it and when you look at it on a 2K display. Gradations are smooth. Colour is fantastic. Sampling shows no signs of pixilation or jaggedness at 2K. At 1:1 at 4K you do see some aliasing and jaggies from 4:2:0 sampling. They disappear when scaled correctly to 1080p or 2K.

Everywhere read about 4k 8 bit 4:2:0 = 1080p 10 bit 444.

But i don't read HOW and how simple is this processing. 

Also, Andrew, you right 4k is a good 1080p, but a thing i've to say: does not have much sense to buy a 4k camera to use in 1080p. No way.

Well, cold mind this morning, and we've to admit that "4k output" is the devil's solution to get from the consumer as much as they can, because the future says 4k will be internal the camera.

So does not make much sense to take it, especially because next year will be there, with its 4k. 

Den or the Sony spec sheet? Who is right?

 

3840 × 2160(30p/24p) / 1920 × 1080(60p/24p) / 1920 × 1080(60i),YCbCr 4:2:2 8bit/ RGB 8bit

Sony Specs here: 

http://www.sony.net/Products/di/en-us/products/vq5f/index.html

It's a 4:2:0 sampling. That's the original Codec. Full hd. 

Output 4k: seems to be uncompressed and 4:2:2 8 bit

What's the cheapest external 4k recorder? 

In 4k do we have this  "First FF non pixel binned sensor"? 

Also, 8 bit only, how could it be in post? Well, you can adjust something before to shot, from the camera, but is it enough? 

Iso sensivity in movie mode: 200-102400. 

Iso in movie mode: 200-102400. 

What else? An advanced (how much?) Full HD recording. 

Disappointed. 

Is it over?

When he said 4k via external recorder only?

It's a trap!

Olympus will never do it. And you know what? Shoot 30p, fuck 24p, fuck Olympus (how wonderful ibis has).

Would like to ask: is it true you can set iso up to 3200 max in video mode?

 

Also, it is not clear if it has or not AA filter..

For lens i suggest: if you want a zoom there's the panny 14-140 also..

For em10, i mean..

Would like to ask: is it true you can set iso up to 3200 max in video mode?

Also, it is not clear if it has or not AA filter..

For lens i suggest: if you want a zoom there's the panny 14-140 also..

Really hope for d5200! 

Really exciting, i've the nikon d5200 and a Sandisk 32gb 45mb/s (hope will be enough for all hack). Maybe we have just to wait the beta version, the d5200 is supposed to be just right now the best cheap option (even if 3300 introduce now 50/60p, so the d3300 could be the best cheaper solution in a few weeks..).

Anyway: can we have in the first post the guide how to hack our cameras? I know for nikon d5200 alpha version is useless. But a general guide could be useful

What about slr magic 11mm f1.4? Too much distortion? Thanks

For me, the 1" sensor of the Rx10, and so its crop factor, make me prefer the A7. What has rx10 more than A7? 

But the question is how to fight THE problem: a "cheaper" and light FF-Mirrorless camera body from a way, and an expensive poor set of lenses right now aviable. Yes, you can use adaptors, so, what is the best choose? 
 

- A m43 lens? All the mft funs are watching this event and are a bit worried the other ones (as Panasonic-Olympus) will follow Sony with NEW mount. There the problem of crop images. In post you can edit and zoom in. But the quality? It's the same? 

- Vintage/Legacy lens. Is there a crop here, or not? The OM lens, for example, do they need an adaptor or don't? Other legacy lens? 

Thanks 

Thanks