Jump to content

Julien Ramirez Hernan

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Julien Ramirez Hernan

  1. Of course, but this is also true of DSLR's (which also all vary in the way they downsample, thus some are less handicapped by their smaller pixel size than others). A 5DMk3 or D5300 with a Kubrick f0.7 lens would doubtless smash a BMPCC with SB+f1.2 in low light.

    Sensor size does matter - given two sensors identical in every way other than size, the larger sensor will perform better in low light.

     

    A real world test would be interesting though - Nikkor 55mm f1.2 on: Pocket+SB; 5DMk3; D5300; GM1+SB.

     

    Regardless, personally I don't rate the Pocket that highly as a low light camera because the colours become so washed out. Furthermore, a Speed Booster does not affect the depth of field a lens creates - a 55mm f1.2 wide open on a GH3 would produce a DOF more or less the same as a 55mm 1.2 wide open on the Pocket with Speed Booster.

     

    Hi, first of all sorry for my bad english. 

     

    In pure math terms the SB doesn't change the DOF but that's not important. The DOF depends on the distance from the subjet too so because the speedbooster changes the field of view , you must approach from the subject to have the same shot you would have without the speedbooster. It means that, actually, you have a shallower DOF. (this questions has been answered many times on BMC and on EOShd i think)

×
×
  • Create New...