Nomad

"I don’t consider 16:9 a cinema look! No idea why all our ‘cinema’ cameras shoot that way." Oh God... this again! 16:9 happens to give a 1.77 ratio, which in turn happens to be half-way between the 1.66 and 1.85 ratios, which were the standard picture ratios of the whole film industry during the second half of 20th century (and on), mind you.. I suppose that the previous standard ratio of 1.33 (4/3 if you prefer) has even less of a "cinema look" for you? Too bad people like Griffith, Eisenstein, Welles or Marker didn't know. I fully understand your enthusiasm for anamorphic, but please don't assume that "cinema" or "cinema look" depends on one aspect ratio!