Jump to content

Bruce Allen

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bruce Allen

  1. A couple of thoughts:   1. Saying that 2D films' use of depth cues to cleverly simulate 3D makes them somehow artistically superior is an odd argument. It's like saying painting is superior to sculpture because it simulates 3D rather than actually doing it. Also, have you noticed that the best 3D work still uses those depth cues as well?   2. Most of those 4K displays also support 3D. Some of them support it without glasses. A lot of them have alternate lines polarized opposite directions. This means you can put on cheap, lightweight 3D glasses and see a lovely high-res 3D image without flickering.   3. Personally I just like 3D when it's done well. Saying it's a format nobody wants is hyperbole. If you want to, say it's a format that a niche of people like.   4. We're just getting started. The future is quite clearly a glasses-free experience which is not just double-eye stereo but lightfield. Eg you move your head around and can see around the object. This should feel far more natural.   5. Have you considered that some of the reasons The Hobbit looked a little like video were due to things like 270 degree shutter, RED (limited dynamic range, skin tones), etc? It doesn't necessarily make sense to automatically blame what you didn't like about The Hobbit on 3D.   6. 3D can look amazing if projected properly. When you're sit in a bay at a top-end post house watching good content, you're like "holy shit this is awesome" Have you considered that maybe, just maybe, the reason filmmakers are excited about it is not because of technical or financial reasons but because they genuinely want to share that feeling? Sorry it doesn't measure up... but when technology improves (laser projection will do a lot, since it is brighter and due to technical polarization details, loses a lot less light when you view it through polarized glasses), I sincerely hope that some folks will get to experience that feeling too.   7. Marketing is about a simple message. "Smart 3D UHDTV" is just too complex. Focus on the new stuff. 3D is now assumed.   Bruce Allen www.boacinema.com
  2. Hey Andrew - one correction: the FS700 will also use the AKS-R5. The HXR-IFR5 is just the name for the thing that connects the FS700 to the AKS-R5. Otherwise, yep. Great summary! Oh - and if you look at the pic of the camera you'll see an ND filter switch. Jon Fauer has some good info at fdtimes.com - the RAW is 3.6:1 compression, etc. Now the real question is price! $15k for the F5 and $25k for the F55 would be great. Wonder how much the RAW recorder and media will be! I'm guessing RAW recorder a little expensive, media expensive but not as bad as RED (Sony's media for the F65 is actually cheaper than RED media at the moment). And those lenses look nice. Prices! Prices! I wonder if they won't announce a slightly high price just to keep F3 sales going... then do some kind of weird financing / rebate thing when the cams actually launch in early 2013 to take the price down $1000. Exciting times for filmmakers. Totally agree on the Alexa and RED influences. And one more thought - doesn't this also look similar to Panasonic's modular 4K design that they showed pics of at last NAB? Bruce Allen www.boacinema.com
×
×
  • Create New...