Jump to content

apiece

Validating
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by apiece

  1. If people only care about end results, i.e. the hack. Sure, my comments are not "contructive", but if people do care the process of getting to the end results, i.e. the ethics, the morale, I can say I am "contributing" to the awareness of that aspect of the project as well.
  2. [quote name='richg101' timestamp='1345149100' post='15833'] You are in the minority here. Your effort to sign up and be openly negative can only be for non constructive reasons. [/quote] The reason I signed up was to bring awareness. I apologize if my comments appear to be non-constructive, but I know I am not the minority, and you know it too. Because you also participate in the other site, and you know someone1.00 is frustrated due to the conflict of interests. Again, Andrew's efforts are amazing in raising the $$$ and drawing awareness to the project, but could those be good enough reasons to justify all the negative claims/acts? Vitaly was in the process of setting up the funds for the project too... just one could raise $$$ money faster, does that warrant one to have the rights to hijack others' previous/ongoing efforts? Again, I do not think this site is entirely at fault, as I mentioned. Someone.100's indecision would be part of it.
  3. I spoke up since yesterday because I think what's going on is not right. who is bullshiting... readers understand better. "hijacking" domain/other's efforts are not my own words, and I do not intend to continue the argument. By now, I am sure people understand better what's going on than I do...
  4. humor....? Guess people should view such incident as by-products of someone.100's indecision: first collaborated with Vitaly with an entire site setup, and suddenly get "kidnapped" by $$$$. If it's for the community, why couldn't everyone collaborate together???? Now, Vitaly has even removed the nex-hack topic from his main site. So we should thank you and start to question someone1.00's integrity???? If we go through his comments on http://nex-hack.com... he nagged so much about not having controls of how his name is mentioned, and didnt get the $$$$ earlier... then, you should ask him why he couldnt be more thankful!! If Vitaly will not be involved technically, I am sure the whole project will suffer... so hope that wont be the scenario.
  5. I wrote because I care about this site... and since you are asking people to donate money in good faith. I think it's just fair to provide some general ideas how the money will be distributed (beside buying cameras), for example, among EOSHD, someone1.00, and MagicLantern (since you have also included Malcolm in the article), etc. If the current focuses are on 1st gen NEX, maybe people can donate cameras instead of cash... or sell their cameras @ a discount...
  6. Thanks for the sharing the update, but the thing I would like to understand more is: if nearly $1000 is raised, why only $700 has been transfered? "[b]The difference in image quality is actually not huge between the un-hacked GH2 and factory GH2."[/b] I visit this site quite often because this site offers unique perspectives, not distorted ones. Now, I am a bit uncertained... There are so many of your previous articles praise the hack, and how the hack makes a huge difference... suddently, it is underplayed, potentially because it's done by someone with whom you disagree...
  7. Comment by someone1.00 http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?259944-Sony-NEX-Axx-Firmware-hacking&p=1986188872#post1986188872
  8. I inquired about the officiality of the nex hack site, as there appears to be more than one, and both are related to someone.100 in the other article, and suddenly comments are removed, and the thread is locked for comments. why? because of conflict of interest? I raised the question for the community. why it is censored?
×
×
  • Create New...