NeoNSerg

Here is another point.. 1) Shutter. Maybe it is not FPS only but Shutter makes the difference With 24p you shoot with 1\48 ... Stop frame at 1\48 is a blur.. here or there or everywhere.. so constant blur from frame to frame gives smooth action. With 48p you shoot at 1\96 at least.. Stop frame at 1\96 is likely to be sharp.. at least half will be sharp.. Depends on lens of course but chances for shart "photo-like" frame are much higher. And that is where all those "sets look like sets" come. 2) DOF. Another trap comes from DOF. For 3d they need focus everywhere, so that eye can then see 3d and blur himself.. And that is where another trap "sets look fake" come. In 2d they would be blured away , no one would look there.. But now it is all sharp.. oops Just my  5 cents

wow,I thought it was only me.. I was shocked when Cameron said 60fps was the future.. I hate new LCDs and switch off that smoothering.. but I thought it was me only.. Good to know there is huge protest against that. As for Avatar - I love that. Here is an interesting fact In January 2007, Fox had announced that 3-D filming for Avatar would be done at 24 frames per second despite Cameron's strong opinion that a 3-D film requires higher frame rate to make strobing less noticeable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_(2009_film) So maybe FOX saved Avatar even from Cameron  :)