[quote author=BurnetRhoades link=topic=738.msg5441#msg5441 date=1337262698]
It's an inherent part of the craft with these tools. Given the fact that it's an option, as a shooter, not being at least somewhat versed in the options available would be like a traditional cinematographer not caring to know they have a variety of choices in film stock, each with its own qualities, quirks, strengths and limitations. They wouldn't really be competent in their role if they just grabbed a box of film off the shelf, shot and were either disappointed or pleasantly surprised by the results. Any overly successful imagery would be through no fault or praise of their own and they would likely be unable to duplicate such efforts if they ever needed to.
Photography/cinematography, like filmmaking in general, like most complicated artistic craft, is also a technical discipline. It's not either/or if you wish to claim true ownership of your craft. And if you don't then there's no reason to be discussing it outside a pedestrian list of likes and dislikes, exposition being mostly a selfish exercise when its devoted to gut opinion.
[/quote]
In general, i agree with what you said. As most of us us are all-in-one filmmakers (or people, who have video capture devices is a better description for bigger part) there is a need to cover both creative and tech part. Usually, while creating things you come across technical limitations and then try to figure them out. What i see now is need to shoot things to prove you can do it and that is not filmmaking, it's a tech competition of some sort.
I don't call myself filmmaker, but i hope to be able to one day - when i get that new cool camera:)