JuiH

hi Andrew, have you had any luck with the Sony a6400? i am considering purchasing one as a gift to a young Missionary couple to China.

hi,

would EOSHD Pro Color Sony v4.0 be suitable for the Sony a6400?

i had previously purchased Pro Color Sony v3.0 for my Sony a6300 which i resold.

Thank you

  On 11/1/2019 at 11:30 PM, tupp said:

ETTR is suitable for raw and uncompressed formats.

 

Just be careful going by a histogram alone.  If you have zebras, set them in the range of 95%-100%, and use them to determine your upper limit and to choose which parts of the image may or may not blow-out.  Waveform is also good for finding the upper limit.

Expand  

hi, would ETTR still be suitable for 8-bit 4:2:2 from a 5D MArk iv or an EOS R? i have C.Log on both of them. i much prefer the 10-bit 4:2:2 of my Sony FS-5 however i find it harder to achieve pleasant skin tones with the Sony than with either of the Canons.

hi, i am fairly new to colour grading and to filmmaking. i used to use an old Panasonic MX and a Canon XL2 and did not do any adjustments to the video apart from editing, in-camera white balance and audio levels. i have more recently been learning colour grading with ColorFinale and Cinema Grade in Final Cut Pro X.

in terms of ETTR, would this be more suitable for normal picture profiles / picture styles than for Log profiles? i understand that Log profiles stretch out the data for highlights in order to increase the dynamic range that can be captured and in this case wonder whether there would be less data for ETTR in the highlight areas.

i currently use a Sony FS-5 which i usually shoot in Cinegamma (PP4) in 10-bit 4:2:2 Full HD, however i also use Canon DSLR's (5D MArk iv) and Mirrorless (EOS R) which i have been recently combining with a BlackMagic Video Assist 5" in order to obtain outboard 8-bit 4:2:2 Full HD. i recently upgraded my 5D MArk iv with C.Log but have yet to try C.Log with either camera.