WDHX

So what about the color science , do you think they have worked on it because until now sony was not  looking appealing to me ?

Many thanks for this , I think many were waiting for this comparison . How is the gx7 compared to the gh4 in low light ? And will the bmcc speed booster work/fit also on the gh7 , including the image stabilization and aperture control ?

Canon somehow started the revolution , and now take a look at the groundbreaking revolutionary new products that canon presented at the last NAB .

I never saw a camera cheaper than a c300/dragon/alexa on a „real“ commercial set

 

thats what I was talking about

 

but why not using it for the first little indie feature?

 

GH4 , 5D Raw , BMCC , BMCPC

Also, I guess I am a little miffed at some people disregarding my tests because Philip Bloom took some videos of his cat and pronounced it as one of the best video images in a mirrorless camera ever.

:D  

Thanks for the upload ! Would You mind to upload some video files ?

As for me I am not kidding myselfe . You have to take the relation between the quality and the price . That thing costs about 600 $ . I have a big collection of canon lenses , and as a documentary shooter this cam gives a lot of possibilities even with its shortcomings . There is moire but it is not so big that it would make the shot unusable . The low light sensitivity is not the same as with the 5d3 but it is not much worser . Using the speedbooster will get you one stop more which makes it compareable to the 5d , and makes my 24 -105 L work together with the satbilization , which for me shooting documentaries is important . The Image holds up well when doing a slight gradeing which once again for documentary stuff or for me is enough . Not to mention such things that it is small and has the sony typical screen , both things allow for me to create the intimate atmosphere or shoot in difficult or forbidden places , or perhaps throw it away or or smash it on somebodys head ( 600 $ ))) . All the controled enviroment shots I can do with my 5d3 ML RAW . But it is once again the question what You need it for , I would not start shooting commercials on it or my first indie feature, there you are right and in that case this is a tiny ugly avchd cam . But in the end it is all theory until I have not put my thingers on it as You did . Would you mind to post two iso 3200 and iso 1600 shots a wide angle shot and a medium shot in a naturally lit enviroment ( kitchen , living room , gas or metro station ) ?

Thanks a lot iag01 , that looks quite impressive , I mean considering the low price of that cam , the diversity of lenses that u can use and the praised low light possibilities it makes a good low budget docu cam . The fast AF in video mode is also a great feature , but it want propably work that fast with EF lenses on a speedbooster .

hello everybody ,

i see the thread is really going on like the tales of one thousand and one night  . Some of you reports that the a6000 is a masterpiece and on the other hand some of you say that its image quality is quite weak . I saw andrews anwser that the hdmi output gives only a slight better quality ( and that propably it is 8 bit 420 ) so not a big advantage . I have downloaded and seen a few examples which all differ so much in quality and still can not form an opinion . The best would be to buy it and test it but I am on a longer trip right now . So my question to you , can you desribe how good or bad the internal recording quality  is in terms of detail resolution ? Is it compareable to the 5dm3 ( not ML RAW , poor details , mushy picture  ) or does it rather goes more towards the quality of th fs100 ? I am thinking about  a combo together with my 5dm3 ( ML RAW for controled enviromemnt , deep focus panorama shots ) and the a6000 for handheld documentary shots ( no intensive gradeing , shorter depth of field ) . What do you thing guys ?

Has anybody tested the HDMI output ? 420 ? 8 bit ? 24 p 25 p ?  Looking at the image quality in some videos , the codec is a real restriction .