SKYLIKE

Is it really 0.01% though?

 

Stills photographers are pretty interested in raw I'd say...

Well it was a wild guess :D

But Canon make their money in the consumer segment. I would guess they dont even care about magic lantern. Maybe technically they could have done RAW Video in 2008 for a 50D but there was no demand so there was no supply. And nowadays they dont want to destroy their eos cinema line :>

And just to remember:

For those who are doing video with dslrs ... the masses want do small workflows, little files, compressed formats. RAW is again for the small percentage.

It's funny that we could have had raw video on DSLRs in 2008.

 

You have to wonder - do Canon want to make money or not!?

Because Canon is a mainstream company and even now that raw thing is out .... its 0,01% of their customers who are interested in that.