Jump to content

FRAME-Link

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FRAME-Link

  1. The TV comparison comes up a lot.

     

    "It looks like TV" not cinema. Is this a learned thing or are people really saying "It looks cheap and not artistic"?

     

    If there's an inherent aesthetic flaw here in 48p surely Peter Jackson, with his eye, would have spotted it way before it got on a cinema set.

     

    I do wonder that if the costume and prop departments could raise their game even further, and with the right material, that 48p 4K in 3D could be a winner. I just don't think this epic fantasy production is well suited to it.

     

    All those silly beards...

     

    What about a thriller set in a hyper real-life location where you feel like you are there?

     

    The intention of The Hobbit was to make you feel like you're in Middle Earth. If the result is that you feel like you're on a set, than make the set less like a set and more real.

    Here comes another Judge Dredd!! That has invented the way the wheel spins with his good old 24p from his camcorder/dslr. And that's without watching the film... More money than taste? ... after a trilogy like LOTR? We are lucky that we have a very small bunch of directors doing blockbusters that we can consider cinema, and Jackson is clearly one of them. It's so easy to criticize the work or vision of others, and usually only amateurs have that attitude, cuz they don't know what it is like to be out there in the real. With a bit of humbleness towards others work (any creator) maybe one day you could discover or understand there vision.

    PS- I've always loved the 24p look...

×
×
  • Create New...